Laserfiche WebLink
■ Property expanded lot beyond work limits <br /> ■ Missing understory vegetation in buffer zone, only trees present <br /> ■ Driveway significantly different in 2018 plans vs 2006 approved plans <br /> ■ Additional retaining walls added without approval <br /> o Next steps, Future Process &Enforcement Options: <br /> ■ Property owner must file a new COC application once everything is <br /> square away <br /> ■ Staff will handle communication with homeowner going forward <br /> ■ Fines can be instituted if compliance continues to be delayed <br /> ■ Different consultant recommended to complete work,not same landscaper <br /> ■ Commission will review recommendation to either reject or approve <br /> future application <br /> ■ Discussion item to be brought up regarding potential fines <br /> ➢ FAILED INSPECTION <br /> Agent <br /> • Inspection did not pass due to deficiencies in required mitigation plantings. <br /> • Property owner has been notified and staff will work with them to achieve compliance <br /> Motion <br /> • Mr. Cook made a motion to deny the Certificate of Compliance, which Ms. Godfrey <br /> seconded. <br /> • Vote: Mr. Cook(Yes), Ms. Godfrey (Yes), Ms. Thornbrugh (Yes), Ms. Clapprood (Yes), <br /> Mr. Sahl(Yes), Mr. Colombo (Yes) <br /> • Motion passed unanimously <br /> Documents provided: Falmouth Engineering,Inc.; Request for Certificate of Compliance 43-2974 <br /> Plan of Record and Recorded Order of Conditions <br /> C C <br /> 6 Jehu Pond Road, Robert S. & Martha D. Johnson, Trustees, Robert S. Johnson <br /> Revocable Trust & Martha D. Johnson Revocable Trust <br /> ➢ Representative: Cape & Islands Engineering, Inc <br /> ➢ Order of Conditions #43-2967 <br /> ➢ Review: <br /> o Mitigation work was completed but not placed in correct location—there's a gap <br /> between existing mitigation and top of bank <br /> o Current mitigation meets the required square footage but lacks continuous <br /> coverage as mandated by order of conditions <br /> o Plan Review & Compliance Issues <br /> ■ 6,433 sgft of mitigation required according to plan of record <br /> ■ Some patio configurations differ between approved plans and as-built <br /> conditions, but total impervious surface area was actually reduced <br /> 7 <br />