Laserfiche WebLink
 Financial burden concerns raised about requiring expensive plans for case- <br />by-case reviews, with a suggestion for informal preliminary discussion <br /> Tax revenue vs. environmental protection debate – concerns about <br />restricting development affecting property values vs. primary mandate to <br />protect resource areas <br />o Septic System Regulations <br /> Septic system standards revised to match Tisbury regulations with <br />percolation rate requirements of 5 minutes per inch or slower for <br />groundwater protection <br /> Language clarification needed for septic system upgrades vs. new <br />construction, with agreements to simplify language, removing redundant <br />phrases <br /> Soil conditions discussion on varying percolation rates in Mashpee <br />o Building Code & Home Run Authority <br /> Home rule authority concerns raised about language requiring compliance <br />with current building codes, potentially limiting future ability to impose <br />stricter standards <br /> Retaining wall standards discussion on balancing building code <br />compliance with erosion prevention requirements <br />o Final Formatting & Approval <br /> AO’s (advisory opinions) removal from performance standard 7, as <br />they’re not applicable to Cape Cod geology and groundwater-fed streams <br /> Formatting changes to separate new construction from existing buildings <br />for clarity <br /> Mr. Cook made the motion to approve draft 8, which Ms. Clapprood <br />seconded <br /> Vote: Mr. Cook (Yes), Ms. Zollo (Yes), Ms. Godfrey (Yes), Ms. <br />Thornbrugh (Yes), Mr. Sahl (Yes), Mr. Colombo (Yes) <br /> Motion passed unanimously <br /> <br /> Climate Resilience Initiative/Resolution (Commissioners Thornbrugh – Zollo) <br />o Mr. Cook made the motion to table this discussion, which Ms. Clapprood <br />seconded. <br />o Vote: Mr. Cook (Yes), Ms. Godfrey (Yes), Ms. Clapprood (Yes), Mr. Sahl (Yes), <br />Mr. Colombo (Yes) <br />o Motion passed unanimously <br /> <br /> Enforcement Order – 87 Hooppole Road (Refer to Agent McManus) <br />o Conducted with one COC passing for the house and vista pruning <br />o Enforcement order is for the restoration plantings that remain incomplete <br />o The original contractor did not follow through on enforcement order and order of <br />conditions despite having accepted plan by commission <br />o $300 per day issued to homeowner for non-compliance with enforcement order <br />terms and deadlines <br />3 <br /> <br /> <br />