My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/21/2025 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
08/21/2025 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/18/2026 5:28:23 PM
Creation date
10/27/2025 10:04:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/21/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Town of Mashpee Conservation Commission <br /> 16 Great Neck Road North <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> goals, and that alternative locations for the facility should be found. Ms. Barbee also questioned claims made <br /> by town staff suggesting that open space designations expire after 30 years, expressing shock that this could <br /> apply to cluster developments. She urged the town to maintain a balance between environmental responsibility <br /> and conservation integrity. <br /> Discussion: (Public Comment solicited for each discussion - *3 minutes per comment) <br /> • Water Quality: Issues and initiatives (ongoing discussion item) <br /> o 231 Vineyard Reach(43-3328): Willow Treatment <br /> Discussion: 231 Vineyard Reach (43-3328) <br /> Regarding willow removal and phragmites management. Originally, the approved permit required manual <br /> removal of willows unless a plan for herbicide use was submitted. The applicant requested herbicide use due to <br /> accelerated growth from heat and drought conditions, and concerns about disturbing sediment if removal were <br /> mechanical. <br /> The Commission discussed a targeted herbicide application, focusing solely on willow leaves, with minimal <br /> impact to aquatic life. Representatives noted that the HOA and New Seabury Golf Course were collaborating <br /> to eventually submit an amended order of conditions for comprehensive phragmites control across the entire <br /> water feature. The proposed timing for the willow treatment would be late summer or early fall to prevent <br /> uncontrolled growth next season, with the amended phragmites plan ideally submitted in the winter to allow <br /> spring application. <br /> Commissioners emphasized that the amended order should consider seasonality and potential impacts on <br /> amphibians and aquatic species, noting that the willow herbicide plan would be handled by a consultant <br /> specializing in aquatic environments. The targeted approach was considered a unique opportunity to control <br /> invasive species in this isolated water feature,reducing the chance of regrowth compared to larger, <br /> interconnected water bodies. <br /> The Commission confirmed that the gray willow, an invasive species, is the only target for herbicide <br /> treatment. Other native willow species, which are wetland indicators, will not be affected. Tyler Goudreau,the <br /> specialist handling the project, will be informed to ensure compliance with this directive. The discussion also <br /> touched on the planting plan, including whether cattails would be reintroduced; this will be reviewed and <br /> potentially revised as part of the upcoming amended order of conditions. <br /> The Commission reached a consensus to move forward with the herbicide application according to the <br /> proposed plan, with treatment expected within the next month. Additionally, the amended order of conditions <br /> to address phragmites removal across the larger water feature will be initiated promptly. <br /> o 34 Triton Way (43-3333): Woods Hole Group Coastal Bank Stabilization Design <br /> Peer Review <br /> Discussion: 34 Triton Way(43-3333) <br /> Woods Hole Group representatives Alex Carbone, coastal scientist, and Mitchell Buck, senior coastal <br /> engineer,presented a peer review of a coastal bank stabilization design. The project proposed rebuilding the <br /> lower revetment and adding a concrete retaining wall along the top of the coastal bank. Woods Hole Group's <br /> review focused on the retaining wall footing, which is embedded primarily in coarse sand that could erode <br /> during storms. While a double layer of four-foot boulders was proposed for lateral support, the consultants <br /> expressed concern that the stones could be undermined during significant storm events. <br /> From a regulatory perspective, they noted that the vertical retaining wall would conflict with the Wetlands <br /> Protection Act and local Mashpee By-law performance standards, which require projects on coastal banks to <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.