Laserfiche WebLink
Town of Mashpee Conservation Commission <br /> 16 Great Neck Road North <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> impervious surfaces within the 75-foot buffer to coastal bank and near the floodplain,both of which are <br /> jurisdictional resource areas. She asked for guidance from the agents on how to interpret the Wetlands <br /> Protection Act in this context. <br /> Mr. Dibb clarified that the 75-foot buffer does not extend onto the project site,noting the deck is 115 feet <br /> from the coastal bank and that no work lies within the 100-foot buffer regulated under the Wetlands Protection <br /> Act. <br /> Mr. McManus confirmed Mr. Dibb's assessment, explaining that the state's buffer zone extends 100 feet— <br /> not 150 feet—and that all proposed work occurs within an area already fully altered. No native vegetation <br /> would be disturbed; in fact, native plantings would be added within the flood zone. He said that any increase in <br /> roof runoff could be easily managed through dry wells or similar systems, given the project's small footprint. <br /> He concluded that the application was appropriately filed as an RDA. <br /> MOTION: For a negative determination at 18 Starboard Lane. <br /> Motion by: Richard Sahl Seconded bv: Sandi Godfrey <br /> **Not voted on because of the amended motion** <br /> Discussion: Ms. Pitt asked about conditioning drywells. Mr. Kent <br /> stated that an RDA can be conditioned as part of the regulations,it does <br /> not discourage it and it is on a case-by-case basis but with conditions of <br /> an RDA, you can do that and it can be added. <br /> AMENDED MOTION: To amend the Motion for a negative <br /> determination at 18 Starboard Lane with the conditions that one dry <br /> well go in. <br /> Motion by: Seana Pitt Seconded by: Richard Sahl <br /> Vote: Motion passed by unanimous vote. <br /> (Sarah Thornbrugh, Sandi Godfrey, Seana Pitt, Richard Sahl) <br /> MOTION: For a negative determination for an RDA at 18 Starboard <br /> Lane with the conditions that one dry well be added to capture any <br /> additional runoff from the additional roof area. <br /> Motion by: Sarah Thornbrugh Seconded by: Richard Sahl <br /> Vote: Motion passed. <br /> Aye: Sandi Godfrey, Seana Pitt, Richard Sahl <br /> Nay: Sarah Thornbrugh <br /> RDA 35 Santuit Lane, Nelson Jenkins. Proposed to get existing dock registered in the Town of Mashpee. <br /> (Jensen Corporation) <br /> Mr. Nelson Jenkins, president of Jensen Corporation and owner of 35 Santuit Lane presented a RDA to <br /> have the existing dock on his property officially registered with the Town. He explained that his intent was <br /> simply to ensure the dock was recognized so that he could replace deck boards in the future without issue. Mr. <br /> Larsson asked if there was a float and Mr. Jenkins acknowledged that the original drawing shows a float, but <br /> confirmed there is no float currently in place and that adding one in the future would require a Notice of Intent. <br /> He emphasized that no changes to the dock's structure or pylons were proposed. <br />