My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/08/2025 SELECT BOARD Minutes
>
09/08/2025 SELECT BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/22/2025 1:48:59 PM
Creation date
12/22/2025 1:46:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
SELECT BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/08/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Select Board <br />September 8,2025 <br />Minutes <br /> <br />would bear that responsibility. The Board stressed that the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) <br />should not approve the project if it fails to meet applicable fire and building codes. <br />Environmental concerns were also addressed, particularly around wastewater discharge <br />and the Town’s obligation to maintain flow neutrality under State Revolving Fund (SRF) <br />financing requirements. Chair Wyman-Colombo noted the absence of any meaningful <br />discussion in the Mass Housing letter regarding where e?luent will be discharged and <br />whether the system has the capacity to handle the volume. Wyman-Colombo reiterated <br />that Mashpee is held to flow-neutral development standards and that this project could <br />jeopardize compliance. <br />Selectman Weeden noted the reference to lending conditions under the New England Fund <br />(NEF) program, particularly provisions that require approval of any transfer of the NEF <br />lender's interest during the term of construction financing. These stipulations, present in <br />NEF documentation. Selectman Weeden requested further legal review on this matter. <br />Legal eligibility and process integrity were major themes throughout the discussion. <br />Selectman Weeden expressed concern that the applicant may not meet the eligibility <br />requirements under 760 CMR 56.04, which requires that the proponent be a limited <br />dividend organization, nonprofit, or public agency at the time of application. The Mass <br />Housing letter states that the applicant “could be” a limited dividend organization, but is <br />not yet one. Weeden felt that proceeding without verifying this requirement undermines the <br />legal foundation of the process. Additionally, concerns were raised about a potential <br />conflict of interest involving the Zoning Board Chair serving as the developer and the <br />current property owner. Weeden urged that this issue be evaluated by Town Counsel to <br />ensure that there is no undue influence or procedural irregularity that could compromise <br />the Town’s zoning enforcement authority. <br />Chair Wyman-Colombo and several members strongly supported the need for Town <br />Counsel to be actively involved in guiding the ZBA through the Chapter 40B permitting <br />process. Wyman-Colombo emphasized that the ZBA’s role is complex and governed by <br />statute, requiring adoption of procedural regulations, rules for public hearings, and <br />administrative oversight. There was general agreement that the Town should not wait for <br />the ZBA to request legal assistance but should instead proactively ensure that legal <br />support is available at each stage to avoid missing any steps that could result in <br />constructive approval. <br />Concerns regarding quality of life for future residents—particularly children—were also <br />raised. Member Richardson pointed out that the project site lacks usable green space. <br />10 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.