Laserfiche WebLink
the structure complies with all other dimensional requirements except minimum lot <br />size, do not increase the non-conforming nature of the structure and may be done as <br />of right subject to all other provisions of the Zoning By-Laws. Examples of minor <br />alterations include the addition of a dormer, the addition of or enclosure of a porch <br />or sunroom, the addition of a one story garage for up to two cars or the conversion <br />of a one car garage to a two-car garage, the addition of small-scale, proportional <br />storage structures like a shed, and a minor increase in height. <br />C. Changes, extensions or alterations of nonconforming single- or two-family dwelling <br />structures which do not meet the applicable dimensional requirements as set forth <br />above, such that they increase a lawfully preexisting non-conformity without <br />creating a new non-conformity, as well as changes, extensions or alterations of all <br />other nonconforming structures, or nonconforming uses, may not be made unless <br />there is a written finding pursuant to M.G.L. Ch. 40A §6 by the Board of Appeals <br />that such change, extension or alteration shall not be substantially more detrimental <br />to the neighborhood than the existing nonconforming structure or use to the <br />neighborhood and that there is adequate land area to provide sufficient parking and <br />setbacks as may be required all per Subsection D below. <br />D. Although said finding shall not constitute a Special Permit as defined by the general <br />laws and this Bylaw, the Board of Appeals shall follow the procedures specified in <br />the general laws for Special Permits in processing requests for such findings. For <br />the purposes hereof, compliance with dimensional requirements shall be determined <br />by the Inspector of Buildings. <br />E. The creation of a new non-conformity whether by way of a change, extension, or <br />alteration to a non-conforming single- or two-family dwelling or otherwise shall <br />require a variance unless otherwise exempt under the Zoning By-Laws. For <br />example, a pre-existing non-conforming hotel that does not meet current setback <br />requirements and is seeking to extend the structure in such a way as to expand <br />beyond current lot coverage requirements must seek a variance. <br /> <br />History: Amended 10-4-1993 ATM, Article 24, approved by Attorney General 10- <br />18-1993 <br />History: Amended 10-17-2005 ATM, Article 22, approved by Attorney General 3- <br />7-2006 <br /> <br />§174-17.1 Raze and Replace <br />History: Added 10-15-2018 ATM, Article 16, approved by Attorney General 1-9- <br />2019 <br /> <br />A. No pre-existing, non-conforming single- or two-family dwelling structures shall be <br />torn down and rebuilt on any lot in such a way as to increase any non-conformity <br />unless there is an issuance of a Special Permit from the Zoning Board of Appeals. <br />For the purposes of this subsection, increasing the structure size on a non- <br />conforming lot, even if the new structure meets the current setback requirements, <br />shall constitute an increase in a non-conformity and require a Special Permit. <br />B. A Special Permit under this Section 174-17.1 may be granted only if the Zoning <br />Board of Appeals finds that any changes, extensions, alterations or reconstruction <br />of the pre-existing non-conformities are not substantially more detrimental to the <br />neighborhood than exists prior to removal of the existing structure and that there is <br />adequate land area to provide sufficient parking. <br /> <br />