06/16/2026 COMMUNITY PRESERVATION ACT COMMITTEE Minutes

Home Browse Search

The .recommendation Counsel’s Town on based action no or on application Project Preservation Community and Cultural Mashpee place oT MOTION: Recommendation :Project Preservation Community and Cultural Mashpee1. (Cont’d) BUSINESS .Application the within and Applicant the by referenced were support of ettersL enter.C Visitor a as open is building the forebe used be may storage and greenhouse the although ,public the to open be not will and accessible not is building the ramp, a is ntilU .in moving before be will greenhouse the whether re Discussion approved. are documents all that sureen to want will they and CPC the to documents and Invoices required. is that if ,license —contingencies with agreement grant a is approval, any After license. the on contingent be it that include can which funds the of release recommends only CPC success. for Applicant the positioning therefore, and language; the in information basic—detail minimal only using and warrants re discussion General .it support will voters the whether meeting, the before out sorted elicens the whether regarding Discussion Center.) Education and (Nature .Center Visitor a of goal primary its for since ushingp been has Applicant The . funding a was there but ,1992 in suggested was Center Visitor The project. need which of all ,Friends the and ,fugeRe the Town, the as goals the meet to like would Applicant the ,lows been has process the Although years. 2½ for Manager the with working been have Friends The progressed. sha application/proposal how about isconceptionsm regarding Discussion water the to property the of proximity the to due involved is Commission Conservation the because vacuum a in reviewed be not will plan site The .Commission Conservation the of purview the to subject is discussion of type hist Further, group. working the for are surface impervious and parking as such matters that consensus CPC this at parking for used be might surface similar a whether and accessible wheelchair is which design natural-all an with lot gravel pressed its including , Heritage Greenway Coonamesset the of benefits the re Discussion .survey the of cost the increase may of opesc ncreasedi an that Consideration project. the of success to add will which group orkingw a be will that also and ;plants selling ,end the on revenue of generation Applicant’s the appreciates Waygan member Committee .tcomplian ADA be will building entire The basis. case-by-case a on determination a such would and ”of support in“ is something whether determine to information need would Counsel the application, this of case the in owever,H .”recreation of support in“ considered be would head at sbathroom and recreation” of support “in things those fund legally may CPC the that clarifies Chair A legal opinion was sought by the CPC and the Town Counsel does not see a path forward for this application to qualify for CPC funds under either the historic or recreation categories. The CPC therefore cannot recommend this project. 4