Laserfiche WebLink
Town of Mashpee Conservation Commission <br /> 16 Great Neck Road North <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> Mr. Davis reported that the Friends had applied for and received approval for Community Preservation Committee <br /> (CPC) funding for a greenhouse and raised beds at the site. The funding was scheduled for consideration at fall <br /> Town Meeting and was contingent upon execution of an agreement with the Town and Town Meeting approval. <br /> The Friends also planned to engage Cape and Islands Engineering to document existing conditions and develop a <br /> site plan addressing the proposed greenhouse, raised beds,parking and overall site layout. Mr. Davis stated that <br /> plans would be presented to the Conservation Commission before work proceeded. <br /> The Friends also intended to establish a working group to discuss development of both the exterior site and the <br /> interior of the existing building. Mr. Davis explained that the building contained four apartments; the Recreation <br /> Department was interested in using one, while the Friends anticipated using the remaining three for office, visitor <br /> center and storage purposes. The proposed working group could include the Recreation Department, a <br /> representative of the Town Manager's office or Select Board, and a representative associated with the Conservation <br /> Commission. <br /> Commissioners discussed whether a Conservation Commissioner should participate in the working group,noting <br /> that doing so could create a potential recusal issue when future project components came before the Commission <br /> for permitting and could affect quorum. Alternatives discussed included participation by a Conservation <br /> Department staff member or seeking environmental input through the Environmental Oversight Committee. <br /> In response to a question regarding the Commission's role if CPC funding received Town Meeting approval, it was <br /> explained that the CPC funding was contingent upon Conservation Commission approval because portions of the <br /> property were within 200 feet of the water. Proposed improvements, including the greenhouse, raised beds and <br /> parking, would therefore be subject to Conservation Commission review. Potential future trails were also <br /> mentioned. <br /> The property was described as being located on Route 151 near where the Childs River passes beneath the road, <br /> with a long wooded driveway and the building set back near the water. The discussion also referenced Johns Pond, <br /> a smaller pond identified as Flying Squirrel Pond, and the possibility of vernal pools on the property. <br /> The Commission agreed to hold off on placing selection of a working-group representative on a future agenda until <br /> the Friends finalized their agreement with the Town. Mr. Davis stated that they hoped to complete the agreement <br /> during the month and that it needed to be finalized before fall Town Meeting. <br /> 61 & 67 Shoestrin!Bay Road—Decision <br /> The Commission deliberated on the application for 61 & 67 Shoestring Bay Road following closure of the hearing <br /> on July 23. The Commission noted that it was on day 14 of the 21-day decision period and would not meet again <br /> before the deadline. The cumulative impact report was identified as the final document submitted by the applicant. <br /> Mr. Colombo read five separate findings into the record: <br /> 1. Peer Review/Cumulative Impacts: Mr. Colombo stated that the peer review by Brian McCormick <br /> provided useful information regarding tidal elevations,preliminary slope stability, localized marsh <br /> hydrology and marsh migration,but expressly stated that assessing cumulative impacts was beyond the <br /> scope of the review. He found that the applicant therefore did not provide the integrated analysis necessary <br /> 2 <br />