My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-DESIGN REVIEW
TownOfMashpee
>
Town Clerk
>
Minutes
>
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
2006-DESIGN REVIEW
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2016 9:19:34 PM
Creation date
11/17/2016 3:19:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/31/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�Duck`Pond Limited Partnership <br /> 106 Falmouth Road <br /> Self-Storage Building, contractor, storage and <br /> business incubator/light industrial/office/lab or research space <br /> Stuart Bornstein appeared. Design Review Committee reviewed the plans with Mr. Bornstein: <br /> • Dumpsters at back wall only need 10 feet,rather than 20 feet shown. <br /> • Put in 4 loading docks but won't be able to get in them...one goes through handicap area. <br /> • Don't depress loading area <br /> • Show where 9 parking spaces are behind building 2. <br /> • Mr. Bornstein said they will be putting wall unit air conditioners in the offices. Design Review said these wall <br /> units should be shown on the Plan. <br /> • Need cross-section; Floor Plans; and colors to be submitted to be reviewed. <br /> • Concrete wall shown on Plan around whole perimeter of buildings—why? <br /> • Show lighting on Plan. <br /> • Show Site lighting Plan. Mr. Bornstein said they have Plan used for Cape Cod Commission, which he'll bring in <br /> for next meeting. <br /> • Finished Plan...dimension fence; clearing line; and retention walls should be shown. <br /> Landscape Plan...the cypress are really spread out and are not good screening. Mr. Bornstein responded that this <br /> is an industrial site and it's a waste of money doing these plantings. Walter responded that is his position but <br /> Design Review merely makes recommendations and it is up to the next Board to make decision. <br /> • Design Review will send written recommendations to the Planning Board. Also will recommend to make sure all <br /> plantings from existing projects be done or don't issue occupancy pemrit. <br /> • Mr. Bornstein made the suggestion that he take some of the trees and move down about 20 feet. Design Review <br /> said he should have the engineer put on Plan for this Committee to look at it. <br /> • Mr. Bornstein asked if there is somebody they could call if they have any questions. Walter said they have his <br /> number and can call him. Walter stated that site-engineering plans don't match architectural plans. He suggested <br /> they should get together to know what each other is doing. <br /> Conclusion: Not approved. Revised Plans to be submitted. Design Review is advisory Board and will send written <br /> recommendations to the Planning Board. Will also recommend to make sure all plantings from existing projects <br /> be done or don't issue occupancy permit. <br /> Auaroval of Minutes <br /> Minutes of April 13,2006 as presented were unanimously approved. <br /> Adiournment...Meeting was adjourned at 10 a.m. <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> �i�Gc�G�t/T7 <br /> Criliberti <br /> ecording Secretary <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.