Laserfiche WebLink
• Ms. Ahigren moved an amendment to the motion - that <br /> the vote for officers be at the immediate next meeting whether <br /> all members are present or not. Ms. Mills seconded the <br /> amendment. ALL IN FAVOR. Vote on the amended motion. ALL IN <br /> FAVOR. <br /> Mr. Dinizio informed the committee that the RFP as <br /> developed by the Siting Committee had been changed. Item s4 <br /> under Scope of Services now reads 'identify the types of <br /> structures and design features satisfying community needs and <br /> SFSB criteria which may be utilized on each site." Mr. Dinizio <br /> also informed the committee that the opening of bids would be <br /> June 16, 1993. Members questioned whether this changed RFP <br /> would accomplish what the Siting Committee wanted. Mr. <br /> Dinizio explained that -1114 was tagged by counsel and that we <br /> must identify designs rather than create designs because this <br /> would require another architect to review. <br /> Mr. Greelish expressed the hope that the Committee is <br /> able to get enough information based on the revised RFP. Mr. <br /> Polito explained that the site itself would dictate suggestions, <br /> square footage of the building as required by the number of <br /> students, etc. and that the next phase would be a design phase. <br /> Considerable discussion by members regarding <br /> multipurpose use of the building and that suggestions and input <br /> is needed from parents. the community and the school <br /> committee. <br /> Ms. Ahigren moved that the RFP as amended is <br /> adequate. Mr. Jones seconded. Ms. Murtha mentioned she would <br /> like a day or two to review the RFP. It was determined that this <br /> was already too late as the publication date is May 26, 1993 and <br /> the deadline had already passed. Vote on motion: ALL IN FAVOR. <br /> Mr. Greelish suggested that the meetings of the <br /> Committee be moved to evenings in order to encourage more <br /> L <br />