Laserfiche WebLink
c <br /> • MASHPEE HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE MINUTES <br /> AUGUST 17 , 1993 <br /> MASHPEE TOWN HALL <br /> Present: Peter Dinizio, Merry Sue Ahlgren, Janice Mills , Paul <br /> Griffin, Bill Martiros , Bill Jones, Joe Polito, Tom Fudala <br /> Absent: Steve Greelish, Robert Mills, Linda Murtha <br /> Also Present: Carl Franceschi , DRA, Gary Larson, DRA <br /> Meeting convened at 4:05 p.m. <br /> DISCUSSION WITH ARCHITECT <br /> Carl Franceschi presented a Schedule of Meetings for the <br /> Committee' s review. He worked backwards from a proposed Nov. 1 <br /> special town meeting . They expect to have their final report a <br /> few weeks before that date but they need the appraisal <br /> information 2 weeks before that to incorporate it. (The <br /> Executive Secretary is working on the RFP for the appraisal <br /> work. ) He suggested they meet bi-weekly prior to that. DRA can <br /> continue to make progress between meetings and reserve alternate <br /> weeks if something comes up. <br /> The Committee agreed they have other business to take care of on <br /> • alternate weeks and will continue to meet weekly : preparing for <br /> Phase II work after town meeting , preparing RFP for the architect <br /> of the next phase, developing agenda' s for those alternate weeks. <br /> Mr. Franceschi expects the geo technical engineer and traffic <br /> engineer to attend the meeting in 2 weeks to answer questions. <br /> Bill Jones asked if the traffic engineer would have a fairly <br /> definitive study at that time? The Committee would like a <br /> summary of the report/study. Mr. Franceschi responded the <br /> traffic engineer will have come to their conclusions but it will <br /> not be in a final report format. <br /> The geo technical may be just the beginning of more information <br /> to come. <br /> The Committee reviewed the Site Selection Matrix presented by <br /> DRA. Mr. Franceschi explained it is a proposed format and the <br /> criteria can be ranked with a positive, negative or neutral , <br /> relative to the other site. Each criteria will obviously have <br /> different "weights" . <br /> Bill Jones stated that aesthetic appeal is not on the criteria <br /> list, i . e. one site overlooks the Quashnet River, one site is <br /> rolling and wooded. It is a vague term but is important. <br /> Joe added that creating a town center, giving the town an <br /> identity may also be important. Peter suggested the overall <br /> impact to the town be considered. <br /> Mr. Franceschi noted there are secondary benefits, or negatives, <br /> • the project creates that are beyond the proximity of the site. <br /> You cannot get confused as to what is driving the project. <br /> 1 <br />