Laserfiche WebLink
D Estimate 1st draft 2/7 : $22 , 558, 278 . <br /> nd Draft: $22 , 069 , 202 . There was a miscalculation in the <br /> torm water drainage system and agreed to reduce markup from 9% to 7%. <br /> rd Draft: $21 , 793 , 976 . This reflects SMMA' s detailed <br /> eview of the estimate. After review the following changes were made: <br /> eneral conditions - $164 , 000 <br /> ite work - $195 , 000 <br /> asonry + $210 , 000 <br /> isc. - $183, 000 <br /> alance $20 , 970,000 <br /> $ 823 , 976 . <br /> by was the estimate at the end of the last phase different from this one? <br /> t the end of the last phase SMMA proposed $2 , 600, 000 worth of reductions, <br /> he Committee took $1 , 800 , 000 . They did not get the full value of those <br /> eductions. <br /> here is an increase in stormwater drainage +$100, 000 , landscape and site <br /> mprovements +$140 , 000 . Change from brick to concrete block was less of a <br /> avings than estimated , $120 , 000 less . Roofing is $84, 000 more , because of <br /> miscalculation. Lab case work , $100, 000 more . <br /> eter asked how much the savings is for masonry instead of brick? <br /> 230 , 000 total . <br /> roposed action . There is a $620 , 385 cost overrun . SMMA has proposed <br /> hanges amounting to $509 , 690 , changed which don 't effect the program of <br /> he building , leaving an overrun of $110, 695 . They are proposing to go to <br /> id with that and have an alternates list. <br /> d said they don ' t take pride of authorship of these lists . Any other <br /> uggestions will be welcomed . <br /> aul said he has been studying the estimate. The site work is still $2 . 8 <br /> illion , it has gone up $3 . 00 per sq foot yet most of the cuts were in the <br /> ite work . The Committee made drastic cuts in site work, where did it go? <br /> oel said $958, 000 was voted to be deleted from the site. <br /> aul asked where it went, if we took $900 , 000 out, the estimate should be <br /> own but it is up. Where did the deductions go? What happened? <br /> hil had a summary from Brian Lawlor who reviewed the site on a line by <br /> ine basis identifying where the differences are. They anticipated a <br /> 127 , 000 savings for changing the track surface but it is only $59 , 000 , for <br /> xample. <br /> aul said he has been fuming since he got this estimate. At the last <br /> stimate meeting , in Cambridge , he said he did not think these numbers were <br /> alid. The Committee said it then and are saying it now. They would not <br /> have proceeded with the design if they knew then they were really $4 . 5 <br /> million over ! Then , the format of the estimate was switched so the <br /> Committee cannot compare the two ! It is the best sandbagging job he has <br /> seen in years . <br /> This Committee cut and cut and cut from this project. They spent many <br /> hours trying to cut costs only to find out they did not come near to <br /> cutting enough. SMMA already took the $300,00 anticipated savings from the <br /> STP so the project is really $1 million over ! He is very upset about this . <br /> 3 <br />