Laserfiche WebLink
KENNETH C. COOMBS SCHOOL <br /> SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GOALS <br /> 2009-2010 <br /> Preschool: <br /> Subject-Literacy/Math: In the context of literacy and math for Work Sampling reporting, we will <br /> implement the Class Rating Checklist monthly to measure student achievement. <br /> Results: The assessment tools were implemented to measure student achievement and to drive <br /> instruction. The team found these tools useful. <br /> Kindergarten: <br /> Subject-Reading: To demonstrate DIBELS improvement to the next benchmark: 60%of"at risk' <br /> students will move to"some risk"or"low risk"on the Letter Naming Fluency Assessment by June 2010. <br /> Results: A total of 1 I students moved from"at risk"in September to"some risk'or"low risk'by June. <br /> 19 students were followed. 8 stayed"at risk'(42%). 3 moved to"some risk'(16), 8 moved to <br /> "low risk"(42%). A total of 58% met goal. <br /> Grade One: <br /> Subject-Literacy: Students will perform above the state average in Oral Reading Fluency and Nonsense <br /> Word Fluency in DIBELS testing on winter 2010 and Spring 2010 DIBELS. <br /> Results: Grade one students who were performing at an"at risk'level were targeted through third tier <br /> intervention and progress monitoring. Students working in small groups who received third tier <br /> intervention were moving from"at-risk'to"low-risk'category.After final DIBELS test, most students <br /> were performing above the state average in Nonsense Word Fluency. <br /> Grade Two: <br /> Subject-Literacy: Second grade at risk students will increase their Oral Reading Fluency by ten words by <br /> their winter assessment. Second Grade students will increase their Oral Reading Fluency by ten words by <br /> their spring assessment. This would be a total of twenty words for the school year. <br /> Results: 70% (8 out of 12)of the"at-risk"students increased Oral Reading Fluency scores by twenty <br /> words by the end of the school year. The four students who did not meet the goal received special needs <br /> services. According to the DIBELS data for spring 2010, 97 students out of 126 were reading 90-208 <br /> wpm by the spring 2010 benchmark. The 4th grade benchmark is approximately 120 wpm. The Fountas <br /> and Pinnell RTI Expectations for grade 2 Oral Reading Fluency for Tier 1 students is 80-100 wpm; Tier II <br /> 60-70 wpm;Tier III is 50 wpm or below. <br /> The DIBELS stabilizes or flat-lines after the second graders hit 90-100+wpm(sometimes in Winter <br /> scores,often in Spring). After that they are reading with expression and meaning(which is what we <br /> really want). We have been discussing the usefulness of DIBELS for those students who are reading over <br /> 100 wpm. <br /> Special Education: <br /> Subject-Reading: To compile a list of available interventions for teachers to implement with students <br /> who fail to make progress in the regular reading curriculum. <br /> Results: Areas of focus for reading interventions with special education students were defined. <br /> Additional interventions will be included in TAT reports and implemented as priority interventions by the <br /> classroom teacher or other staff member. Effectiveness of interventions will occur in six-week intervals. <br /> School Council: <br /> Subject-Literacy Development: To develop a calendar of"Mashpee Reads" reading activities—January <br /> through June to celebrate reading. <br /> Result: This goal was met 100%. <br />