My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-SEWER COMMISSION
TownOfMashpee
>
Town Clerk
>
Minutes
>
SEWER COMMISSION
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
2005-SEWER COMMISSION
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2016 9:24:34 PM
Creation date
11/17/2016 3:27:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
SEWER COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/31/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Waquoit Bay is a heavily loaded system and was degraded very long ago. <br /> Tom said given the amount of reduction required, most likely all red and blue areas will need to be <br /> taken care of Brian said some yellow area will have to be looked at too. <br /> Brian Howes asked that the criteria be kept open for future change and be open minded about what is <br /> primary, secondary areas to be sewered. <br /> Tom said that is exactly what will be kept in mind when developing scenarios. <br /> Ed Baker said he has different views of priorities. The goal is to reach a"magic" number within <br /> Popponesset Bay, because it creates conditions favorable to the restoration of eelgrass in the bay and <br /> improve the bottom sediment for animal life. <br /> First, we have to decide what it is that brings us to that goals by having the planning done. There is no <br /> sense getting way past there. <br /> Next have to consider groundwater time of travel and buy items with the longest procurement time for <br /> earliest delivery date. <br /> Define the whole job and then develop a methodology for order of implementation. <br /> It is opposite to Brian Howes' opinion. <br /> Ed said it upsets him to see the "red" end at the town line. <br /> Wastewater treatment discharge has to go back into the ground at some concentrations. Will need to <br /> know what number is going back into the ground and where, which is a second, competing scenario. <br /> Tom said Stearns and Wheler is contracted to model scenarios to achieve the ultimate target. <br /> The issue of timing will be discussed when doing the final plan. <br /> The goal of the plan is to do it most cost effectively to hit the target. <br /> To complicate it further,there are 3 towns contributing to the watershed. Mashpee does not want to <br /> clean more than its fair share. <br /> Tom received an email comment asking why we are not looking at composting toilets and is there <br /> support to pursue that. <br /> The pilot project ran a model using on site systems with average results of 19 parts per liter. Even with <br /> every house in the Popponesset watershed on a de-nite, the problem would worsen at build out because <br /> they are not removing enough nitrogen. <br /> John Cahalane, Selectmen, 37 Summersea Road. He said the Commission must pay attention to how <br /> much is too much (cost) and this has to be affordable to residents of Mashpee. How clean are residents <br /> willing to pay for? <br /> Tom agreed that is a very big issue. The town is being told by DEO what the TMDLs are and what the <br /> target will be. Is there an alternative to DEP's TMDLs? What is another level of clean? <br /> Brian Howes responded that based on science, you would have to convince the State and Fed. There is <br /> leeway in which estuary to clean up first. <br /> If the fix is too expensive it won't happen. <br /> Brian Howes said on site, alternative systems are maintenance and monitoring headaches. <br /> He said to forget natural attenuation and non direct removal and spend some fraction of funds on <br /> restoring ponds or restoring wetlands to intercept nitrogen. <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.