Laserfiche WebLink
Tom said the targets need to be discussed in a way people can relate to. <br /> Is there a year, when the quality of the estuaries was good, that could be used? <br /> 1980 there was a good shellfish population. <br /> Brian Hoes said the Bays support sports, fisheries, shellfish, tourism, local economy. <br /> Ed Baker said this all started with the clean water act of 1972. The EPA mandated states set standards <br /> for water bodies. <br /> Pio Lombardo, Lombardo Associates, had some question on the needs assessment report and how the <br /> data was available and how some things were calculated. Pio and Jeff Gregg discussed his questions <br /> and requests for information. <br /> Pio said it would be helpful for scenario development for there t be demographic characteristic related <br /> to the problem that needs to be solved. <br /> Tom explained the Sewer Commission want to model a Nitrex system, it that not possible to model? <br /> Dr. Howes said Nitrex is too site specific and you need site specific hydrology information. <br /> There is a lot of information in the MSP report and in the data which is available to everyone. <br /> Pio Lombardo explained he has submitted a proposal for consideration to use the Nitrex options as one <br /> of the scenarios. <br /> For small lot application, 1 year of data has shown results of 3.6 parts per million. The barrier system <br /> costs $1 per pound of nitrogen removed, which is about 15% of the cost of sewering. Nitrex is less <br /> costly than conventional sewering. <br /> Tom explained the Commission discussed the possibility of dong a Nitrex scenario and think it makes <br /> sense for Pio to develop that scenario. Can he work with Stearns and Wheler to accomplish that? <br /> Nate said their concern that the playing field is as level as possible. Pio has the expertise to develop <br /> that proposal. <br /> Pio concurs about the level playing fields. He will define what is the mass that has to come out and <br /> where it is coming from. <br /> Dave Palmer, Falmouth. Congratulated the Commissioners on their efforts and said Falmouth has <br /> mutual interests. How can Falmouth work with you to best achieve the goals that affect both towns. <br /> How clean is clean? Falmouth would like to work with you on that issue. <br /> Who cares about this issue? The people who own property here, people who live here, people who <br /> come to visit here. It is about economics and quality of life. As the health of the water bodies decline, <br /> property value will decline. <br /> FACES, organization in Falmouth that wants to work with you to solve this problem. <br /> Tom explained Amy Lowell is Falmouth's representative to the CPC. He would like to see FACES at <br /> these meetings to give input, especially related to Waquoit Village. Mashpee needs to know what <br /> Falmouth is doing; communication is key. <br /> Beverly Kane, Mashpee Planning Board. She asked about if any consideration has been given to <br /> composting toilets. Subsurface disposal through septic system is the culprit. Why has there been no <br /> discussion of alternative toilet—composting and incineration? <br /> If a homeowner were to use composting toilets, could they be exempt from participating in sewering? <br /> 4 <br />