Laserfiche WebLink
2. Dimensions of Lot: Lot No. 2 has a frontage of 50 .feet on <br /> Cross Street and a depth of 100 feet. Lot No. 457 has a frontage <br /> of 50 feet and a depth of 100 feet. Both lots have a total area <br /> of 10,000 square feet. <br /> 14. (continued) <br /> B. The Building Inspector, in deciding that. a septic system <br /> cannot be built on Lot No. 457, acted erroneously. The <br /> effect, if any, of a deed restriction is of no concern td <br /> the Building Inspector. <br /> C. The Building Inspector, in deciding (if he did) that the <br /> easterly yard depth was insufficient, acted erroneously. <br /> Lots 2 and 457 must be combined in determining the easter- <br /> ly yard depth. <br /> D. The Building Inspector, in deciding that the sale of Lots <br /> 2 and 457 was illegal, acted erroneously. Mrs. Ferrara <br /> had a right to sell Lots 2 and 457. <br /> E. Appellant believes that he is entitled to a variance from <br /> the provisions of s. 7 of the zoning by-law to allow him <br /> to build the dwelling, described in his application for.. ... <br /> permit to build, for the reasons set forth below: <br /> (a) Owing to conditions especially affecting his combined <br /> lots (including the deed restriction on Lot 457) but <br /> not affecting generally the zoning district in which <br /> the lots are located (most, if not all, the dwellings <br /> in the neighborhood being on smaller lots with less <br /> yard depths) , <br /> (b) A literal enforcement of the provisions of the by-law <br /> would involve substantial hardship, financial or <br /> otherwise, to the Appellant, and <br /> (c) The desired relief may be granted without substantial <br /> detriment .to the public good and without nullifying <br /> or substantially derogating the intent or purpose of <br /> the by-law. <br /> ✓r�'I .�T �� G2;d�Lec. <br />