My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/30/1980 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
7/30/1980 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2017 3:23:23 PM
Creation date
3/10/2017 3:23:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/30/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Bunikis: I would suggest that if that is going to be a consideration.. . We are <br /> asking for 120 feet for the entire structure. Therefore, if we are talking about <br /> equating the inlet to this depth here (shows the 2 feet contour), we are talking about <br /> moving it back about 35 feet and still give the man 2 feet. What I am saying is that <br /> there is 2 feet on the back edge of the float. So about a maximum of 30 feet to get <br /> 2 feet at the back of the float which will perhaps give at the end of the float about <br /> 2 or nearly 3 feet. <br /> Pauline: Any other questions from the Board? <br /> Wayne: No, we, will meet again and we will go over it. <br /> Pauline: I advise that we all take an on site inspection. <br /> Mr. Bunikis: As far as what the Harbor Master said, yes, I would agree that there is <br /> no harm done on a boat; that is, certain boats. <br /> Chet: As Harbor Master, my own feeling would be that we have shorter docks and a lot of <br /> dredging. <br /> Mr. Bunikis: I don't. <br /> Chet: A lot of people don't. I personally would. I would rather see shorter docks. <br /> To me, it makes more common sense. Remember, your lot is only one of probably 200 around <br /> that lake. <br /> Mr. Bunikis: Yes. But, of course, we are the farthest one in practically. It is nearly <br /> the farthest one up in the pond. <br /> Pauline: Any other questions? <br /> No. <br /> Pauline: Thank you and we will let you know. <br /> Mr. Bunikis: The fact that my client was not here and didn't express his own opinion <br /> and.try to answer your question, I will talk to my client and try to answer that question. <br /> Pauline: We will like $10 for the legal hearing notice, please. <br /> Payment received and receipt given. <br /> Mr. Edgerly , Wheel House Lane <br /> Pauline: This is the hearing that was scheduled at 7:30 p.m. This is after the fact. <br /> Charles went down and checked it and I thought it would be more detrimental to tear it <br /> out and put it back in. Mr. Edgerly would you like to present what you have done already. <br /> Mr. Edgerly: In 1977, I heard about the fact that you should show intentions of building <br /> something over the conservation land. Apparently, I did not send it registered mail and <br /> a check was returned, etc. I had the Stone Engineering Co. make a fairly accurate and de- <br /> tailed report as to berm. So the thing kind of died out. Then I checked with various <br /> -friends and they said, well-as far as we can see. And I said, I drive the Mashpee School <br /> bus. There is a pier in everybody's backyard. So, I personally built a little boardwalk <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.