Laserfiche WebLink
-9- <br /> Mr. Landers: I don't do too many of these for the Town of Mashpee but in some cases the <br /> Falmouth Conservation Board asks us to put a limit of work about the construction and that <br /> way we don't have these problems in the future. It calls out exactly the distance over <br /> the area where the heavy machinery will be going, <br /> Pauline: Absoulutely. And that could be placed in the Order of Conditions. <br /> Mr. Priestly: As a practical matter, the hole is generally 4 feet larger than the founda- <br /> tion, And the fellow that does my excavating does it with a backhoe so that there are no <br /> _ gigantic piles around. It is just piled neatly around the foundation and then there are <br /> two ramps put in the front. I find it works out better because I don't lose as many trees <br /> and all thpt stuff. It takes twenty years for a tree to grow and it takes only two seconds <br /> to knock it down. <br /> Order of Conditions <br /> In accordance with plans submitted. Refer to Plot Plan of Proposed Sewage Disposal System <br /> for B.C.D. Realty 'bust, Mashpee, Ka. dated July 18, 1980, prepared by Holmes and McGrath, <br /> 301 Main St. , Falmouth, Ma. No work to be done within 56 feet of the edge of the marsh as <br /> shown. <br /> No piers, docks, etc. to be included at this time. Separate filing will be required. <br /> sE43-140 <br /> _Francis G. & Annette J. McGee ) <br /> 9.58 Crosstree Way, Mashpee ) This hearing has been postponed until August 20, 1980. <br /> Agent: Tim Hennigan ) <br /> Pauline: Reads Notice of Intent -- to build a residence using "in kind" fill to flood <br /> plain elevations at 258 Crosstree Way in accordance with plans on file with the Mashpee <br /> Conservation Commission. <br /> Dorothy: Is this the Crosstree Way hearing that was advertised in last night's newspaper? <br /> Pauline: Yes. <br /> Dorothy: If it is, then we are going to have to have a postponement on it. It was not <br /> properly advertised, <br /> Pauline: The letter was sent. It was supposed to be in last week's paper. It was not our <br /> mistake; it was the paper's mistake, <br /> Dorothy: Still it did not appear. It was advertised once in last night's paper for tonight <br /> and it can't be done. We cannot hold a hearing. It states specifically in the act that it <br /> has to be published five days before the public hearing is held. <br /> Mr. Hennir:a.n: Do you have to re-advertise? <br /> Dorothy: No. <br /> Mr. Hennir_a.n: What do you suggest? <br /> Dorothy: One week postponement. <br />