My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/22/1980 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
10/22/1980 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2017 3:37:09 PM
Creation date
3/10/2017 3:37:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/22/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
-6- <br /> Ken: Is that within 100 feet of the water, Charlie? <br /> Charles: Yes, It is. <br /> Ken: You will have to file a notice of intent to move that. <br /> Charles: _As I understood from a rumor that was going around, it was going to be <br /> picked up and moved back 20 feet. <br /> Mr. Baker: I am only working for somebody. I don't own the place, but he told <br /> me that the ocean-front owners had the option to move back 15 feet but that is the <br /> limit for the design of Maushop Village. It seemed to me that it is still a pretty <br /> good run to the water's edge from the edge of the cliff. <br /> Charles: If you took a plumb line from that edge and dropped it down, you have <br /> about 18 feet of mounding. That's all. And then you have about .6 to 10 feet to <br /> mean high water. So you have ?0 some odd feet. What it works out to -- the cabin <br /> is back here and the cliff comes down this way and it's virtually perpendicular. <br /> Then about 12 to 13 feet above the base of the beach, you begin to get the tumble <br /> of all this stuff that has come down there. And that works out to about 18 feet or <br /> so and then you have about 6 feet to the high water mark. <br /> Mr. Baker: Well that would mean that all of those place will be within 100 feet. <br /> Pauline: Right. <br /> Charles: The Board of Health has requested of Fields Point Manufacturing because <br /> they are currently the builders) for an indication and plans for stabilization of <br /> the bluff. We are worried about the septics. We can approve the septic now that <br /> is within Title V and distance. Two years from now, that distance won't be there <br /> if that bluff continues to disappear. <br /> Mr. Baker: But they are going to tie in with the central sewerage system. <br /> Charles: It is not a central sewerage system. What you have there -- those three <br /> cabins that are on the side will be going into a septic system that now that they <br /> have summed to the depth that we require, it is just barely within the 150 foot <br /> line to the base of the cliff. <br /> Mr. Baker: Is it in front of their model unit? <br /> Charles: It will be in front of their model. This past week, we went down 32 feet <br /> in a pit in order to make sure of soil conditions and they are dropping the sep- <br /> tics down in that. ' That is where those three cabins that are on the edge will be <br /> going into for their septics. <br /> Mr. Baker: There are more than three -- are you saying the top three? <br /> Charles: Yes, the top three will be going into that and the condominium setups are <br /> going into another septic system. Ench of those are separate. <br /> Pauline: What type of soil did you find at the 3? foot depth? <br /> Charles: Sand. That was no clay. That is why we insisted upon a full examination <br /> at that depth. <br /> Pauline: What was on the sides? <br /> Charles: It varied from fine sand to fairly coarse sand. It is pretty well the <br /> same all the way down. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.