Laserfiche WebLink
-8- <br /> Charles:' Have you got the cement off there yet? <br /> Mr. Savery: Yes. <br /> Ken: What do you want to do? <br /> Mr. Savery:. What we are proposing to do is put compatible fill back on the effected <br /> areas -- the worst areas. What I am recommending is to intertwine that compatible <br /> material with brush and other material and bind it into the soil to hold it and to <br /> stabilize it until such time that we can get the vegetation to develop. We also have <br /> to develop a better angle of repose on that certain section which you saw back in <br /> here. The cut is virtually vertical so that you couldn't support any vegetation on <br /> there at this point which means you would have to fill down off that slope to a cer- <br /> tain point to get a better angle of repose. <br /> Ken: You can make a better angle two ways. You can either fill to the bottom or <br /> take it to the top. You could either scrap away at the top or fill at the bottom. <br /> How would you fill that at the bottom -- just dumb it from the top up over the lip? <br /> Mr. Savery: I would say you would go from the top, right. <br /> Ken: Are you talking about putting sand in there? <br /> Mr. Savery: Compatible material -- sand or bony material. <br /> Mr. Kuebler: I would think sand. We went through this request down at the golf <br /> course. Just a little bit of history -- we wanted to put a permanent structure on <br /> the golf course and the answer was "no, you can't." We said give us some alternate <br /> solution and the alternate solution was to go ahead as long as the fill was suitable <br /> for embankments that we could go ahead and put fill down there which we had done. . <br /> It is a .very passive-kind- of a controlled program because about .as fast as we can <br /> put it down there, nature decides to go ahead and nourish the beaches so we are los- <br /> ing it. It's better than losing the golf course. After we looked at this situation, <br /> we felt if we could put in a permanent structure, we would give serious consideration <br /> to that. We made some inquiries including, most recently, an inquiry that Mr. Savery <br /> made over at the Wetland Seminar. Still the general feelings of DEQE is that we are <br /> not going to put in permanent structures. We classify this as an emergency situation. <br /> One of- our problems, and we will take responsibility, is that there are still builders <br /> that think they have permission to throw material over that bank. At one time, we <br /> encouraged it by sayin„ to local builders that this is a good place to put your mater- <br /> ial. <br /> Ken: Asks about brush on top of the bank. <br /> Mr. Kuebler: No doubt that would take away wind erosion and rain erosion, but you <br /> can't stop big storms. The storm . of 1978 caused a lot of damage. <br /> Ken: That was all grown in there. <br /> Wayne; I talked with Phil Holmes. vie were talking about New Seabury and lrighton <br /> Sounds. <br /> Mr. Savery: I didn 't recognize it. <br /> `layne: We need to stabilize the tow. Talks about getting the water to run off <br /> laterally. <br />