My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/3/1980 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
12/3/1980 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2017 3:39:35 PM
Creation date
3/10/2017 3:39:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/03/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
-11- <br /> '.'gyne: One last question: 'dhat do you think economically is involved (the <br /> aesthetics are nice) of the added cost of retain by buil:iin;; `='-rther into <br /> the slope. The majority of these (,,lith the exception of that one that has the <br /> spectacular view), I don't think would change that much on any of them from <br /> what I can see. What are we talking as far as expense. We can't talk dollars <br /> and cents, but triple or quadruple the work? <br /> Frank: It would probably be double, Some of these things can be moved some -- <br /> maybe 10 or 15 feet up and away. The reason that we haven't done it right now <br /> is that we would have to re-design and we would have to re-draw the plans and <br /> everything else, <br /> Pauline: The one on the point -- could you move that back and to the right? <br /> Frank: As I mentioned before, if you rove it back away from the river (inter- <br /> rupted) <br /> Pauline: You are going to lose your view, I :mow that. <br /> Frank: Not only the view, but the access into it here. This is about elevation <br /> 18 to 20 feet. As you move this unit back up into the slope -- the edge of this <br /> unit is at elevation 20. If you move it 5 feet, you are at elevation 22. If you <br /> move it another 5 or 10 feet you are at elevation 24. That will raise the unit <br /> almost four feet and you've shoved it further back into that hill. <br /> ?avne: I would be looking for 20 feet. And I can see it from the slopes that it <br /> would make it a monumental task. If you are going to gain 5 feet, it doesn't make <br /> any sense in moving it at all. <br /> Erle: Are you talking just that one, Wayne, or all of them? <br /> Wayne: I am talking. about that one unit specifically. That's why I was trying to <br /> establish that one unit's boundaries. <br /> Earle: See how this westerly boundary cuts in here. That restricts us because we <br /> don't own this in here. So that road is backed up just as far as it can go. <br /> Fen: what is the acreage of that piece of land? <br /> F''arle: Eighteen and one-half acres. It's a beautiful setting. .e have to be <br /> very careful of it and I think it will be good to have controlled. The alterna- <br /> tive is to put single family homes in. <br /> Ken: Have you been to the Board of Health -- you haven't, have you? <br /> arle: Well, no. Yes, I'm sorry, we have. de have the disposal permits, <br /> Ken: You do? <br /> Earle: Yes, we have all our disposal permits. They were all perked. <br /> ,:gyne: What size septic systems will there be per unit? <br /> Fr-Ink: Those will probably be like 6'6" in diameter. 'Perhaps a foot or two of <br /> stone on the outside and 6 feet in depth. <br /> :yevne: Per unit? <br /> =-nk: P:o -- per building, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.