My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/3/1980 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
12/3/1980 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2017 3:39:35 PM
Creation date
3/10/2017 3:39:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/03/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
l ' <br /> -6- <br /> E rle ':".7rsters: They recognize it is a .)roblem so it will have to So to a vote <br /> of the district. Some people may op_ ose it. I don't %nr-w. <br /> Charles: H=ve you done tests. <br /> Frank Ching: Just on the water that we have. All of the water quality is all <br /> good. <br /> The third questions is: What are the clans for fighting any fires in the pro- <br /> posed development and where will the Mashpee Fire Department obtain water for <br /> cnntainment. Clearly, there are no provisions for hydrants in here with the <br /> single well systems. However, if, in fact, there are sufficient pressures, etc. <br /> for water from (let's say) half of Cotuit or from a central well, then I think <br /> there would be some provisions for fire fighting capabilities here. However, <br /> the Santuit River is quite close and from the discussions with people in these <br /> types of areas, they usually come up and draw the water that they need. They <br /> bring a full pumper in and if they need more, they usually drop into one of the <br /> rivers or ponds and that is where they will essentially get their stater for fire <br /> containment. <br /> Questions number four says: This area is on a dangerous stretch of the road to <br /> and from Cotuit Village. What are the plans for traffic control? We certainly <br /> don't want to put a traffic signal there and I don't think that the DPW would <br /> actually let us. We could not meet the minimum requirements of the elements, <br /> etc, for the traffic signal. Let me also mention, and just to give you some <br /> idea about the actual numbers of people who will be coming out of here -- In a <br /> very worse case; for example, suppose that this were a 100 percent year-round <br /> community with people actually commuting to a major center (for i-stance, to <br /> Boston or to Hyannis or something like that) and these were all working people <br /> and 88 units in here -- the standard traffic engineering numbers that are used <br /> in the profession are approximately .3 trips during the peak hour per unit or <br /> approximately 9 -- so you are talking 27 trips essentially during a peak hour <br /> which is less than one car every two minutes coming out of here. Again, that is <br /> assuming a worse condition of a complete year-round community and people are do- <br /> ing a normal commute type of travel and that they are all going to work. In <br /> this psp <br /> rticul_r development (I don 't know the market study per se), I would es- <br /> timate that it would certainly be less impact than that; and it is doubtful that <br /> these people would be the type of people who would concentrate their travel be- <br /> havior during peak hour times. <br /> Charles: That is not within the purview of the Conservation Comp:-ission. <br /> Ken : He might a.s well go through with it as it was one of the questions. <br /> Frank China: Certainly, the impact even in the worse cases is 27 car for the <br /> hour or less than one car every two minutes. So, it is certainly not going to <br /> disrupt any traffic. <br /> Erle 77a-stars: We should put up signs. <br /> W:ivne: Oh, you would have to. <br /> C"arles: What do you figure your space will be within each unit? <br /> ;a.rle =rsters: They are going to be big units and we are going to finish off <br /> the basement, which will give them 2,000 se. ft. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.