Laserfiche WebLink
B,it the over-dig is still going: to be to that pa.th? <br /> Frank Chiang; Yes. It is possible to do a wast majority of the work arain in <br /> the upland side of all of these units where we can dig in from the front. This <br /> is why I mentioned the elevation 10 would be a good place to put it because that <br /> would give us a little bit of area to work back up on the other side if necessary. <br /> Wayne: That's what I would like to see if everything goes all right. Absolutely <br /> no work beyond a certain point. <br /> Pauline: That would be written into your Order of Conditions. <br /> Frank Ching: I would assume so, yes. <br /> Fa.xle varsters: Other than the path way? <br /> Wayne: Other than the path way or use of the path way. We could make one and <br /> the same. <br /> Earle "�arsters: We could have the path way on the uphill side of it. <br /> Wayne: I would like to see nothing, myself, below the hill. <br /> a.rle Piprsters: You could have the path way and then have the fence on the other <br /> side as long as it doesn't restrict your vision. <br /> ](an: Earle, the permits you got before, are they still good or is that just for <br /> the Planning Board? <br /> Earle ',arsters : The permit is actually a Board of Appeals permit. It is not a <br /> FlanninF Board permit. It is a special permit from the Board of Appeals and, yet, <br /> is still good. It will be good for about eighteen months more and then it expires. <br /> Wayne: Frank, when was this designed originally? <br /> Frank Ch_ne: It was approved in 1975. The actual design went on in 1974-73. <br /> Wa.vne: '. ith all the new revisions and setbacks and so forth, is there any way of <br /> (and to be fair with you) re-designing this with the same amount of units and so <br /> I <br /> orth and Fetting any more set back from any of the houses? <br /> Frank Chine: From the river itself? <br /> Fdayne: Yes. <br /> Frank China: In all honesty, Earle did ask me to take a look at it. Yes, we <br /> could move it back some. The problem with moving these units back up and getting <br /> P little more set back is the fact that, again, as you move these units up and <br /> back that moves the relationship to the roadway and that moves the roadway back <br /> up. And as you come further back with that roadway that intensifies this cut <br /> along throu-h here and also creates a cut in this particular area (shows on the <br /> plan the area which he is referring, to). <br /> C.-r-!-Is: 3.;t it would pose no problem with the one that is coming down to the <br /> point where the river meets. <br /> - ^',;^ This one? <br /> rn.n✓ - <br /> r'—1 es: Yes. <br />