Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> 1 ashpee Zoning Robert and Joann L}emay <br /> Board ofAppeals V-03-66 <br /> VARIANCE CRITERIA <br /> Section 10 of Chapter 40A requires that the permit granting authority determine <br /> that there are circumstances relating to the shape and topography which affect this lot and <br /> not the district in which it is located and that a literal enforcement of the -laws would <br /> involve hardship to the petitioner. <br /> SPECIFIC FINDINGS <br /> The Board determined that: <br /> 1. that there are circumstances relating to the shape and topography that affect. <br /> the subject lot and not the district in which it is located. <br /> . that a literal enforcement of theBy-laws would involve hardship to the <br /> Petitioner. <br /> . that relief may be granted without detriment to the public good. <br /> . that relief may be granted without derogating from the intent or purpose of the <br /> By-laws. <br /> . that the <br /> property subject is impacted by wetlands. <br /> � <br /> . that the Board determined that without relief the lot could not be used for a <br /> residence, the purpose for which it had been laid out and for which the <br /> balance of the undersized lots in the subdivision were being used. <br /> 7. that the lot has been maintained as a separate buildable lot on the Assessor's <br /> Records and is subject to betterments from the water District. <br /> In view of the foregoing, the Maspee Zoning Board of Appeals found that the <br /> applicant ma the criteria necessary-for the granting of a variance. Upon motion duly <br /> made and seconded, the Zoning Board of Appeals voted unanimously on May 14, 2003 to <br /> grant the following and therefore deeming this lot to be buildable: <br /> 1. a 7foot variance for the frontage requirement <br /> 2. a 66,099 square foot variance for lot size requirements. <br /> isPlan from Cape & Islands Engineering, certified plot plan, dated April 1 , 2003. <br />