My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/28/2003 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
>
5/28/2003 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2017 5:12:11 PM
Creation date
12/4/2017 3:08:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/28/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mashpee Zoning <br /> Board of Appeals AndrewJ. Lipnosky <br /> Lipn sly Family Trust <br /> V-03-69 <br /> GENERAL FINDINGS <br /> 1. the property is located at 35 Notre Dare Lane and contains 25,164 square <br /> feet. <br /> VARIANCE CRITERIA <br /> Section 10 of Chapter 40A requires that the permit granting authority determine <br /> that there are circumstances relating to the shape and topography which affect this lot and <br /> not the district in which it is located and that a literal enforcement of theBy-laws would <br /> involve hardship to the petitioner. <br /> SPECIFIC FINDINGS <br /> 1. the shape and topography affect the subject property and not the district i <br /> which it is located. <br /> 2. the subject property fronts on a river and is impacted by wetlands. <br /> 3. without relief the property could not be used for a residence, the purpose for <br /> which it had been laid out and for which the Balance ofthe undersized parcels <br /> in the subdivision were being used. <br /> . the property has been maintained as a separate buildable lot on the Assessor's <br /> Records and is subject to bettermentsfrom the Water District. <br /> In view of the foregoing, the Mshpe Zoning Board of Appeals found that the <br /> applicant ret the criteria necessary for the granting of a variance. Upon motion duly <br /> made and seconded, the Zoning Board of Appeals voted unanimously on May 28, 2003 t <br /> grant the variance to applicant. The Board rated that this is the last lot in the subdivision <br /> to be developed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.