My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/14/2016 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
1/14/2016 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2017 5:00:22 PM
Creation date
12/27/2017 12:12:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/14/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6:09 Ira G. and Beth H. Rapaport, Trustees, 66 Frog Pond Close. Proposed <br /> patio construction and hardscape improvements. RDA <br /> Resource Area: <br /> Matt Roskie, Hardigan Associates, represented the applicants. He explained the <br /> proposed project is to install patio, hot tub, and fire pit. A drainage system to <br /> collect the water runoff from patio will be installed on the property. The drainage <br /> system was not shown on the plan. The Agent noted the parcel on a photo. He <br /> said the parcel abutting the applicant's home is town owned conservation land. <br /> The jurisdiction is a buffer zone to the top of the inland bank. He noted work had <br /> begun but stopped for permitting. Tom Murphy said there was a lawn and shrubs <br /> preexisting and they started to remove the top of the grass and took out the <br /> shrubs. They put in a trench for the base for a wall but the plumbing and <br /> electrical have to go thru a permitting process so they stopped. The Agent said <br /> when they realized they had to get building permits that is when he was notified. <br /> It wasn't immediately apparent they were aware of the jurisdiction and was not <br /> assessing blame. The agent noted the clearing in the back yard and outside the <br /> top of the inland bank. The left photo indicated a thickly vegetated area. He <br /> didn't believe this project would destabilize the bank and as long as they have <br /> provisions to catch runoff, he didn't see any issues with the project. It meets the <br /> performance standards. He stated they need to revise the plan to show the <br /> drainage system and mitigation plantings and said he would work with them on <br /> mitigation type <br /> There was some discussion on the plan submitted and noted the drainage <br /> system definitely needs to be shown. <br /> No comments from the public. <br /> Motion: Mr. Sweet moved a negative determination subject to the conservation <br /> agent is satisfied with the revised plan. <br /> 6:12 Steven and Judith E. Rivers, 87 Lighthouse Lane. Proposed septic <br /> system upgrade. RDA <br /> Resource Areas: <br /> Jeff Ryder, BSS Design, represented the applicant. He explained the project is a <br /> system upgrade. The plan has been submitted to the Board of Health. The <br /> installation will take place within two days. <br /> The Agent wanted to make sure the replacement grass meets the nitrogen bylaw <br /> standard standards as well as Ch. 172 standards and recommended a negative <br /> determination. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.