My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/28/2016 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
4/28/2016 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2017 5:01:13 PM
Creation date
12/27/2017 1:45:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/28/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
another application for vista views. There was a discussion on the work limit and whether <br /> or not a 4 foot limit was sufficient. The Agent recommended a condition to hire a consultant <br /> and have them submit a weekly report to the conservation department. He also noted on <br /> the existing condition plan from BSS, they show existing setback lines but on the proposed <br /> thea are not setback lines and that is required to be shown on the plans. He also <br /> recommended additional signage on the site regarding the work limits and no activity to <br /> take place beyond that area. The new homeowners must be aware of the vista protocols <br /> as they exist today and they do not extend to past efforts. The project as proposed will not <br /> impact the buffer zone and the project does meet the performance standards. The Agent <br /> noted the plan has been submitted to the Board of Health and under review. Mr. Garulay <br /> stated the drains on site are existing and will be left in place. The Agent noted on the <br /> photos how close the project is to the buffer zone. <br /> The Agent reiterated his recommended conditions: hiring of consultant and submit weekly <br /> report to conservation department, revise the BSS Design plans to show the setback from <br /> the salt marsh. <br /> No comments from the public <br /> Motion: Mr. McKay moved to Close and Issue with the conditions as outlined by the <br /> Agent, seconded by Mr. Shaw. Vote unanimous 4-0 <br /> Grid (Applicant), 65 Seconsett Point Road. Proposed gas main extension and service <br /> connection. Owner of record: Katharine F. Lingamfelter. — RDA <br /> Resource Area: Buffer Zone and Flood Zone, Coastal Bank, Bordering Vegetated <br /> Wetiand <br /> Brad Malo, Coastal Engineering, represented the applicant. He described the proposed <br /> project is the installation of a gas main extension and as service connection to 65 Seconsett <br /> Point Road. He stated any excavated areas are to be backfilled on the same day and <br /> disturbed areas will be stabilized and restored to pre-existing conditions. He noted the area <br /> is currently under construction. <br /> The Agent noted the area on the photos provided and stated the bank is armored. There is <br /> no impact to the coastal bank or BVW. He recommended a negative determination. <br /> No comments from the public <br /> Motion: Mr. McKay moved a Negative Determination, seconded by Mr. Shaw. Vote <br /> unanimous 4-0 <br /> 6:12-Vladislav A. and Viktoriya Vilkomir, 3 Mizzenmast. Proposed construction of a <br /> swimming pool.- RDA <br /> Resource Area: Flood Zone <br /> Viktoriya Vilkomir, owner, was present and explained they are proposing the installation of <br /> an in ground swimming pool approximately 15 by 36 feet in their backyard. No vegetation <br /> will be disturbed. The Agent highlighted the lot on the photo provided. It is a land locked <br /> lot with turf and ornamental plantings that will be removed and no native vegetation will be <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.