My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/5/2016 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE Minutes
>
1/5/2016 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2017 5:00:50 PM
Creation date
12/28/2017 9:17:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/05/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
68 Great Neck Road South continued <br /> • Rear garden at back side of building. Service portion of the building for <br /> daily food deliveries, as well as laundry, etc. Also, trash/recycling <br /> transform erlgenerator here also. <br /> • Building designed to be broken up to break up size visually. Designed to <br /> look like shingled-style mansion. <br /> • Wings at end designed to be a 2 to 1-112 salt box design. <br /> • Upper portion of second floor under roof dormers. <br /> • Displayed sketch-up of 3-D model of building. <br /> • Building height under 35,000 square feet; natural grade elevation about <br /> 61.5, first floor at 61.3 elevation; and maximum height is within 9 inches of <br /> allowable height of 35,000 square feet. <br /> Michael Mendoza noted that between the 3-D model sketch-up and the artistic <br /> rendering it seems to be looking at 2 different building. For example, artistic <br /> rendering has chimney; 3-D model, no chimney; and features look a lot different. <br /> Al Crepeau responded that both documents are accurate, but looking at them <br /> from different perspective. He said the 3-D model is actual building they are <br /> documenting for construction. Mike Mendoza explained that Committee's job is <br /> to look at the building to be built and to be very specific and careful about what is <br /> being approved. All agreed that they would work with the 3-D model sketch-up. <br /> Al Crepeau and Ray Mitrano both confirmed a chimney is planned. Al Crepeau <br /> said chimney is planned but design is contingent upon rooftop mechanical unit so <br /> can't design yet. Mike Mendoza said a statement should be entered into the <br /> record that there is going to be a chimney but not shown because logistics are <br /> still being discussed. All agreed this statement is to be made part of record. <br /> Al Crepeau said they will show document of materials they'll be using, such as <br /> shingles and lap siding; faux stone material on siding of mansion portion of the <br /> building, etc. <br /> Joseph Cummings identified himself as a resident of Windchime and said he filed <br /> a disclosure with the Town Clerk and contacted State's Attorney office and there <br /> doesn't seem to be a problem. He then posed the question asking whether Oak <br /> trees on right-hand side of the building could be replaced with the evergreens at <br /> the end since oak trees lose foliage in the winter. Joe's suggestion was merely <br /> switch placement of the oak trees and the evergreens. In this way, the dumpster, <br /> transformer/generator, etc. would be less visible. Russell Burke said they will <br /> make the revision to replace oaks with the evergreens. <br /> Al Crepeau noted the dumpster is fenced with gate and on concrete pad, which <br /> he said is shown on Landscape Plan. <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.