3/9/2016 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes

Home Browse Search

MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MARCH 9, 2016 MINUTES Chairman Furbush read the comments from the Conservation Department into the record; "The Conservation Agent has reviewed the plans for this proposal. As there is no expansion of structure closer to the coastal bank/wetlands, this does not require a permit application. The agent has made recommendations for storm water runoff capture to the contractor. Mr. Chapman said he is capturing the water into a gutter and released with a splash block. It is not in a flood zone as determined by the Building Commissioner. Mr. Bonvie made a motion to issue a Written Finding with the following conditions; The Board has determined that the applicant meets all the conditions of a Written Finding under Mass General Law 40A Section 6, 2. Conservation Agent recommendations for storm water runoff capture. 3. Plot Plan --- Existing House prepared for Sandi Esposito, 25 Sand Dollar Lane, Mashpee, MA by BSS Design Engineering & Surveying. Scale: 1" = 20', Dated: August 26, 2014, Drawn by: EJP, Job Number 14142, and Drawing Number P22- 64. Also referencing a plan of the actual structure, pages 1 through 3. Depicting a 10' x 12' porch on a blue stone patio. Mr. Goldstein, seconded, Mr. Blaisdell, yes, Mr. Furbush, yes, Mr. Pittsley, yes, and Mr. Bonvie, yes, All were in favor of the screened porch underneath an existing deck. 58 Popponesset Island Road: Owners, Michael and Julie Rand request a Variance to allow for construction of an in -ground pool and patio under § 174-33 of the Zoning Bylaws to vary the setback at least fifty (50') feet from any water or wetland on property located in an R-3 Zoning District, (Map 106 Parcel 25), Mashpee, MA. Mr. John O'Dea, Professional Engineer with Sullivan Engineering and Consulting in Osterville, MA, represented the homeowners for their proposed pool project. The pool will be located within fifty (50) feet of the stone embankment and meets the definition under the wetlands and conservation protection regulations. The project was before the Conservation Commission two weeks ago, and they continued the project requesting additional information on the plan which was submitted to the Conservation Agent, and will be presented at their hearing Thursday (tomorrow) evening. They specifically asked for more plantings along the seaward edge of the lawn, and a pad for the pool equipment that will be located behind the garage. Mr. Bonvie stated that Conservation approval should be obtained prior to applying to the Zoning Board of Appeals. He was concerned that the Zoning. Board approval of the Variance being pre -mature without knowing the outcome of the Conservation Commission hearings and the Conservation Agent's comment regarding the "work limit line" on the plan. He read the Conservation Comments into the record; "This project was presented to the Conservation Commission on Feb. 25t1'