Laserfiche WebLink
are proposing to replant beach grass in the coastal dune area and they are also <br />proposing to mitigate the remaining areas outside of the work area. <br />Mr. Coutu noted there is some existing vegetation that was planted at the top of the bank <br />and the idea would be to transplant some of these on the bank. At the date of <br />submission he met with the building inspector and the building inspector doesn't see any <br />problems with the project from a zoning standpoint. <br />The Agent agreed with the assessments regarding the performance standards for the <br />resource areas and that it meets the performance standards as only minimal alteration is <br />proposed along with substantial mitigation. It is a pool and when it comes to the waiver <br />standards they are looked at from one of the criteria being compelling need and that is <br />not demonstrated. He felt the impact was minor and the degree of mitigation will result <br />as an enhancement. The Agent recommended to submit a revised plan with a reduced <br />footprint of the decking because it doesn't need to extend to the top of the coastal bank <br />and must not replace/interfere with mitigation that was put as a result of the construction <br />of the single family home. Mr. McKay asked why the fence needed to be in the coastal <br />bank. Mr. Coutu explained the reason is to be sensitive to the view of the applicants and <br />the neighbors. There was a discussion on what mitigation was required when the single <br />family house was built. <br />The Agent recommended the hearing be continued in order to do more research <br />regarding the mitigation from when the house was built and to determine if the mitigation <br />was altered over the years. The Agent noted once they have established the initial <br />mitigation it should be re-established and if altered, the design for a pool and patio <br />cannot encroach into the original mitigation area. <br />No comments from the public. <br />Motion: Mr. Shaw moved to continue the hearing at the request of the applicant to <br />February 12, .2015 at 6:00 p.m., seconded by Mr. Gurnee. Vote unanimous 5-0 <br />6:21 The Osprey Nominee Trust, 71 Monomoscoy Road. Proposal of the <br />following reconstructlmaintain pier, ramp and float, remove existing elevated <br />deck, stairs, wood and concrete debris from coastal beach, beach nourishment, <br />extended existing concrete bulkhead along shoreline, remove/replace existing <br />bulkhead along driveway, construct two -car garage, make improvements to <br />existing gravel driveway, install stone patio and fire pit, perform associated <br />grading and landscaping, wetland restoration, native plantings, and invasive <br />species management. Continued from 12/11/2014 revised plans. NO] <br />Resource Areas: LSCSF, Coastal Bank, Land Under Ocean, Salt Marsh, Bordering <br />Vegetated Wetland, Coastal Beach. <br />Matt Costa, Cape and Island Engineering, represented the applicant. Matt referred to <br />multi -page plans given to the Commissioners: first sheet, existing conditions with <br />proposed conditions, second sheet --- mitigation plantings, and third sheet — details of <br />piers, bulkheads, etc. <br />