Laserfiche WebLink
He reviewed sheet one. Property consists of two islands connected by two causeways. <br />The property is located in a velocity zone and in a Natural Heritage area and adjacent to <br />BVW, Salt Marsh and Land Under Ocean. He reviewed the plans. They are going to <br />regrade a portion of the driveway with a gravel base and install a gravel turnaround area <br />which is necessary because it is difficult to turn around on the property (causeways are <br />single lane width). This was situated in an area where no trees need to be taken down. <br />They are also proposing to install two z piled vinyl coated bulkheads with wooden caps <br />and ties tying them together. The walls will touch the mean high water mark so the <br />applicant will be pursing Chapter 91 licenses. They will come up into the driveway and <br />regrade the existing driveway. They have relocated the proposed garage further away <br />from the BVW. It will be located in a predisturbed buffer zone area. They will be closer <br />to the top of the coastal bank which is not a sediment source and completely disturbed <br />with a makeshift lawn and trees down to the edge of the BVW. They are also going to <br />be upgrading the septic tank so it will withstand vehicular traffic. There will be no <br />modification to the bulkhead. They are proposing to do some beach nourishment into <br />the beach area. He noted only 3 cubic yards of material will be used in that area. They <br />will not be in the salt marsh areas. The primary reason is to cover up the exposed <br />footing of the concrete retaining wall. <br />They are also proposing to remove the existing pier and rebuild with an elevated <br />walkway that will start with stairs from the upland side of the existing bulkhead and then <br />span out to the existing gangway and relocate the float to deeper water to protect the <br />shellfish habitat. He noted the concrete retaining wall and is proposing to extend the <br />concrete bulkhead with an 8 foot extension to help stabilize the bank. They are going to <br />clean out the debris and remove a cedar tree and compensate for that with plantings of <br />cedar trees in an area of coastal bank on the property. <br />Matt spoke about mitigation. They are going to do a phragmites eradication along the <br />driveway and do it on a 3 year basis. He pointed out an area of trash and debris that is <br />suppressing natural vegetation and plant with native grasses to help protect the bank. <br />He spoke about the waiver requirement and referred to his narrative. He said they want <br />to leave the site in better condition than when they started so what they did was <br />overcompensate based on the requirements under the regulations which is around 3 <br />times more square footage of plantings that would normally be required. <br />The Agent said in his opinion the activities proposed are ones that will be enhancing <br />existing conditions through mitigation and improve existing conditions in terms of the <br />access roads. He said the turn around area is mostly devoid of vegetation. He said the <br />patio is not going to affect the armored coastal bank. The dock is in need of repair and <br />the harbormaster has submitted his comments that he requires the new float to be <br />encapsulated and the display in perpetuity of the DEP number and the street address. <br />He noted the debris and the large cedar to be removed. The Agent stated the <br />compensated measures outweigh any sort of impact as a result of the garage. Natural <br />Heritage did submit a letter indicating a no -take status. <br />No Comments from the Public <br />Motion; Mr. Shaw moved to Close and Issue, seconded by Mr. McKay. Vote <br />unanimous. 5-0 <br />