10/7/2015 UPPER CAPE REGIONAL TRANSFER STATION BOARD OF MANAGERS Minutes

Home Browse Search

t the property from the Commonwealth but is in the process of divesting themselves from it. The Army National Guard has expressed interest in taking over the land. Mr. Richards suggested that it was not a large issue but one that should be considered. Mr. Scipione added that the site's previous use as a coal yard and for grenade training was being assessed and was expected to be resolved by the end of the year. Regarding market demand, a map was shared depicting where waste was going. Mr. Scipione indicated that there was little interest in using the facility for MSW, adding that Cape Cod waste was tied up for the next 10 years. There was also little interest in a recycling operation. Organics, including leaf and yard waste, food waste and sludge offered some interest, but would likely increase capital costs. There was a lot of interest expressed in C&D. A list of 13 potential uses was developed, including future solid waste transfer station, C&D, compost and salt storage. Weighted criteria was developed in order to identify the best use, and based on market demand, compatibility and capital improvement costs. The criteria was then utilized to scoring in a range of 1-5. 65-Solid Waste 91-C&D 79-Renewable Energy Facility 73-Salt Storage 71-Outdoor Compost Facility Based on their assessment, Mr. Scipione reported that the site offered a long term benefit as a transfer station and should be maintained as such, but also C&D offered a viable option for a public/private use. There was some viability for the site to be used for organic or sewer sludge composting. Mr. Scipione suggested that cooperation with Bourne was recommended or an RFP released. Bourne offered the best option because they were already a member of the Board and on the consent agreement and a third party could create greater challenges. Mr. Cavossa inquired about a private operation running a facility and Mr. Scipione responded that legal reviews would be needed and could potentially limit the opportunities, but Weston Sampson had no additional information. Mr. Richards added that it was not yet known whether subletting would be an option. Chairman Laurent stated that Bourne had experience working with C&D. Mr. Jack stated that he felt the Board would continue to manage the facility whether it was private or publicly operated and suggested that it would not be in conflict with any plans held by MassDevelopment and the intent of identifying a new use was to benefit the communities. Mr. Cavossa expressed concern about Bourne limiting C&D competition if they managed two locations. The Chair responded that the UCRTS would control the facility so that the towns and residents would benefit. Mr. Barrett responded to Mr. Cavossa's concerns adding his preference that the facility continue to operate as it was. Mr. Barrett also talked about residuals being transported by rail, but noted that there was not a large profit margin. Mr. Tilton inquired about the possibility of compatible shared uses that would meet the seasonal needs of towns, such as part of the year collecting C&D and part of the year utilizing it for salt storage. Mr. Richards responded that there were compatible uses, such as renewable energy, salt storage and a small organic system. Mr. Scipione pointed out that the site served as the only CDL Training area for the State Police, with a hope to expand its area. Bob Rowland of the Registry of Motor Vehicles responded that they were not seeking to expand beyond the existing footprint and noted that other CDL Training sites were closing 2