My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/10/2009 COMMUNITY PRESERVATION ACT COMMITTEE Minutes
>
11/10/2009 COMMUNITY PRESERVATION ACT COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/24/2018 1:32:29 PM
Creation date
1/24/2018 1:30:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
COMMUNITY PRESERVATION ACT COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/10/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PRESERVATION <br /> • 7* � <br /> QUESTIONS <br /> QUESTIONS YOU MAY HEA <br /> QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE <br /> As the custodian of valuable and irreplaceable public records, you may be called upon to <br /> make important decisions regarding the ongoing physical condition of the records in your <br /> care. These decisions can involve other public officials such as legislative bodies and <br /> finance boards, as well as the general public,who may have questions about the <br /> procedures and cost related to the care of public records. Following are just a few of the <br /> most common questions we are asked by records managers. Hopefully, the replies given <br /> will answer a few of your own questions as well as helping you to answer the questions <br /> • you are sure to get from others. <br /> 1. Q. WHY HAVE RESTORATION WORK DONE? <br /> A. It is as important to maintain permanent records as it is to maintain any of the <br /> other property of a town, city, county or state with this important difference: <br /> PERMANENT RECORDS ARE IRREPLACEABLE! <br /> 2. Q. WHY NOT JUST MICROFILM RECORDS? <br /> A. Microfilm can be a useful tool to store permanent records, especially as insurance <br /> against catastrophic event; but there are important disadvantages to be considered <br /> when using microfilm as the primary source of permanent records preservation: <br /> • Microfilm can be very difficult to work with. <br /> • Microfilm is often illegible, especially films of early records which may be written <br /> in hard to read script or written on paper that has deteriorated, or offers poor <br /> contrast between paper and ink. <br /> • Microfilm is subject to deterioration even with proper storage. <br /> • Microfilm is often difficult to access for the general public; providing enough <br /> reader and printers for public demand can be costly. <br /> • Microfilming large-scale projects is very costly. <br /> • • Microfilming does not address the important question of still decaying original <br /> records, nor does it address the intrinsic historical value of the original <br /> artifact. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.