My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/18/1993 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
03/18/1993 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/24/2018 5:09:32 PM
Creation date
1/24/2018 2:50:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/18/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Conservation Commission <br /> March 1 , 1993 <br /> Page 11 <br /> would be easier for Ned Philie to complete his revegetation plan for the whole slope <br /> after the physical engineered structures are shown, . <br /> Mr. Slavinsky stated as it is now, one wall goes and the concrete wall is going <br /> where the creosote wall is. <br /> Mr. Sherman agreed if that is the case, then he could probably use the existing plan. <br /> Mr. Cardillo asked how close to the water can one actually go <br /> Mr. Sherman stated if you go into the water it gets more complicated, above the Mean <br /> Annual Flood Level of the pond, it makes it less complicated. <br /> Mr. Cardillo stated he would like to license the dock at the sane time. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated there are two other issues in- the letter. If any irrigation <br /> system is to remain, it should be shown on the plan. <br /> Lastly, there was some foundation work done on the gest end of the house, that <br /> would have to be described and shown? He asked Mr. Slavinsky if the footprint <br /> of the house was accurate and was told it is. He stated a description would be <br /> adequate. <br /> Mr. Sherman asked how long they would need because Town Counsel suggested that <br /> the C mi.ssi n give one more extension and if the proper plans requested are not <br /> received at the next continued hearing, whatever legal steps necessary would have <br /> to be taken. Not to blame anyone, but the fact that no one is accepting letters <br /> from the Commission and no one contacted this office for the whole month. does <br /> not give a lot of confidence that things are moving ahead well.. Town Counsel <br /> stated one more extension should be offered and if all of the required information <br /> which is quite legitimate is not in hand at that time, the Commission will close <br /> and make a decision, based on the information in hand, <br /> Mr. Cardillo was asked how much time he would meed, one month? It would not be <br /> possible to go much beyond that for the replanting and thea the whole slope would <br /> be unstable, which would be unacceptable. <br /> Mr. Slavinsky stated it is basically a landscaping problem. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated the Bordering vegetated wetland will have to be the most heavily <br /> landscaped. What goes above would depend on John's plan and what was there before. <br /> Mr. Slavinsky has talked with two landscape architects, on his own, and they agree <br /> that wall should not be there. <br /> Mr. Cardillo stated his. sisters keep telling him they have pictures of what was <br /> there before and the dock. It was pretty gide open. There were three of those <br /> big trees that fell down in the hurricane and they had a landscaper come in and <br /> cut thea up, <br /> Mr. Sherman stated the bottom part is going to have to be very heavily vegetated <br /> with the kind of species Ned Philie shows. Above that, if you have proper ground <br /> -cover, and if the gees are taken care of. so they are not going to die because of <br /> the roots being covered, some flexibility is possible there. <br /> Mr. Iomeyer stated Mr. Cardillo did not sound interested in doing an engineered <br /> wall. Mr. Slavinsky stated that was not a problem on the bottom one the top one <br /> is a lot higher. The top one is coag out; the other ones they will go along <br /> with the buil in code. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.