Laserfiche WebLink
Conservation Commission <br /> February 1 , 1992 <br /> Page 6. <br /> the septic covered, under the deck. He would take an existing mound of dirt and <br /> put it under the deck. He does not have an existing order of Conditions. The topo <br /> is flat, Mr, Sherman did not see erosion control as a problem S <br /> Mr. Homeyer stated the request, should be denied as it is illegal. <br /> OM: Motion made and seconded to deny the request on the advice of the agent that <br /> it would be an illegal act. <br /> 9:00 NEW CO. for an Amended Order- of on ition under SE 43-921 for landscape <br /> modifications at Lot 1375 Shore Drive. Brian Zeppenfeld and Alan Abrahamson presenting. <br /> As WAM all these cases, they were ficticious footprints. The new building is inside <br /> the footprint. There are no changes in the extremeties, only the parking and stone wall. <br /> There is a utility pad. Barking was two spaces in front. They have moved the spaces <br /> over reducing green span on the northern end and increased it at the southern end. <br /> There will be the same number of trees, only moved. The owners have a. small child <br /> they would like to be able to put outside. 1374 is undeveloped. An as-built will <br /> e provided. They do show a joint enclosure. There will be a separate filing for <br /> this. Board of Health approval is necessary. <br /> Mrs. Simmons questioned why it is shown if not going in. Mr. Abrahamson stated <br /> because if it goes in, that is where it will be. <br /> Mr. Sherman advised, regarding all of the bluff cottages, the Comnussion has voted <br /> when a Certificate of Compliance is requested they would like Mr. Abrahamson there <br /> to certify it was done. Mr. Abramson had, no problem with the request. <br /> . Abrahamson advised the only other change is the material of the terrace from <br /> stone to brick set in sand, not mortared. The other is a grading change between <br /> 1375 and 1374. There will be a 1 foot tie wall at the property line, <br /> Public comments were requested; there were none, <br /> Mr. Sherman stated it seers to fit within the realm of an Amended order. <br /> Vim: Motion made and seconded to accept the amended plan as shown. Unanimous.Vote. <br /> Mr. Zeppenfeld advised he had been mistaken about the time scheduled for the hearing <br /> on Bayview Condominiums and. that was the reason for his absence. He asked that the <br /> 8:15 hearing be reopened. <br /> A motion m s rade to reopen the hearing for Bayview condominiums which was seconded. <br /> The vote was three to two against reopening the hearing. The motion did not carry. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated if the reason anyone voted against it is the problems with the <br /> bluff, it should be noted the Commission is fully justified in making that vote, <br /> however, Bayview is not part of New seabury. Pat Lawrence is the property manager. <br /> The landscaper who did the work has not paid his fine. <br /> The vote remained negative. <br /> 9:15 MCEVM MOSKOWITZ for reconstruction/repair of storm damaged existing stone <br /> revetment at 146p ne set Island Road. Dave anicki presenting. An emergency <br /> order was anted to repair the wall. He chose not to repair but to rebuild. This <br /> • � p• done on-site. The will take clown the <br /> section had toe stone failure. Nothing was y <br /> wall, put filter fabric and rebuild to existing conditions. <br /> Mr. Sherman. advised there is Spartina out there not shown on the plan; that inform- <br /> ation is needed to condition it properly. <br />