3/26/1992 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

Conservation Commission Meeting of March 2 , 1992 Page 2. remain the sane. There is an easement to drive in over the Fee's property, It is jointly owned by him and the Fees. Mr. Cloran stated he had no more questions and no objections. =; Motion made and seconded to close the hearing. Unanimous Vote. =ED. Mr. Sherman asked Mr. Cloran when his project would be completed and told it would be complete in a few weeks. MARY FANOUS, 58 spoondrift way, continued from February 13, 1992. Clint Kanaga had called today and was unable to attend this hearing. IF VOTE: Motion made and seconded to close the hearing pending receipt of the abutter notification receipts. BEARIM CLOSED PID . 7:00 FRMITS J0 All, for a 1 e tenninat ion of Applicability for the permitting of an existing dock at 6 Jehu Pond Road. Ellis Allen presenting. . Sherman introduced Ellis Allem to the commission; he is the Arborist for the Commission* He advised he has seen the dock many times and has no concerns. Mrs. Simmons asked if the Moat was solid or had spacing between- the boards? Mr. Allen stated it is solid. She asked if he would object to the Commission conditioning that there must be spacing on the hoards if the dock is replaced? He agreed and acknowledged this would have to be recorded. Public comments were requested there were none. V=: Motion rade and seconded to find a neg t.i e determination with the condition if future maintenance is done, spacing will be provided on the deck and dock. ION, Mr. Sherman stated the Commission should be notified before any maintenance is conducted. 7:15 WILSON ROMM to relocate a fence and install a french drain at Lot 1373 Shore drive. Brian Zeppenfeld 'presenting with nary LeBlanc. After-the-fact filing fee was received. The only change on the reprised plan is additional plantings to the top of bank on the ocean side. This all relates to the fence issue. There is nothing to keep people from walking right up there. New Seabury has provided an easement for a neighbor to walk through the Rogers property to get to the beach area. whether the fence is in this location, 10 feet back, or no fence at all, there is nothing to prevent traffic, if that is the concern. she suggested they should be looking at encroacing on that easement and pulling Rosa Rugosa back and allowing a more narrow pathway. New Seabury has been adamant that there will be signs at -all entrances, at the bottom of the bead stairs, "private" and "no trespassing". once fully developed, the only ones using the property will be the Rogers and the family to the left, -or north. Foot traffic will be much less than when it functioned as a Motel.