Laserfiche WebLink
I ` <br /> Conservation Commission <br /> June 4., 1992 <br /> Page 5. <br /> :40 MMM KUMM for the construction of an addition to an existing dwelling at <br /> 44 Bayview Road. Bob Gray and Randy Swe tisk presentin i.th K .n. Abutter <br /> notification receipts were provided. For the previous filing and this one also, <br /> the Conservancy Program was notified and a letter from thea was provided. <br /> Revised plan provided this past Monday, by hand delivery, from Mr. Swetish. <br /> The permission to access fon was received. <br /> Mr. Sherman requested the abutters list; Mr. Gray will provide same. Concerning <br /> the attestation of ownership form, Mr. Gray stated it was included ,-the previous <br /> filing. The site has been dealt with. In the narrative any reference to there- <br /> tan rng wall is not under this Notice of Intent; plan is the same. The only lot <br /> before the Commission tonight is Lot 44. The pink line on the pian is top of bark, <br /> the most landward resource area. <br /> Mr. Gray advised no work will be dome on the bank itself. The addition will cover <br /> 150 s.f. of buffer zone on 6 - " concrete piles in place of sono tubes. The cover <br /> letter to the Notice of Intent was based on the p1m that was revised. They went from <br /> four 8't wiles to a total of 6 piles. The shape of the addition is a trapezoid. The <br /> 150 s.f, i accurate i coverage the ground. There W1 be r�.in anal d is turbans e <br /> because there is no poured foundation. <br /> Mr. Sweti h stated they are trying to take advantage of the room available. This <br /> started with a desire for a tub in a bathroom that did not have one. <br /> Question was raised for the flagstone walkway. Mr. Sherman had concern for a foot <br /> path and asked if foot traffic is.necessary, He asked if they would build this with <br /> tie higher than the flagstone'Ha asked-where roof runoff was directed, is it <br /> gutters to dyel,l It was stated this is possible. He stated, if accepted, it <br /> would be more satisfactory for a roof gutter leading to a drywell. <br /> Mrs. Simons asked the height the retai.r� g wal19 Mr. Gray stated it is only <br /> on the plan because it was used before. (Wall is 4 or 4-112 feet). <br /> Mr. Sherman asked what is to be the area of disturbance on the NE side of the add- <br />: ition; ghat will plantings be and was told a Chokecherry tree. The Spruce tree <br /> will be left. <br /> Mr. Swetish stated he will dig a 2 x 2 hole to get a 2 x 2 pad in- that is the <br /> amount of disturbance per hole. The method of filling the cesspool was described <br /> as shown on the drawing, <br /> . Desrosiers asked what will be done with the sand removed and was told it will <br /> be used to fill the cesspool. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated no bobcat is allowed on the bank. <br /> Mr. Gray stated they could never put a machine on that embankment. Mr. Desrosiers <br /> stated seeing it in writing would lea d hien to believe it is intended. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated if using that material, they would have to hand carry it up the <br /> bank. <br /> . Desrosiers stated if any material is intended to be remnoved, it cannot be removed <br /> by mechanical means. Mr. Sherman will make this clear in his meeting tomorrow morn- <br /> ing with the contractor. It is very close to the top of the bank and he 'would request <br /> a profile of that edge and top of bark. (Cross section). <br />