Laserfiche WebLink
Conservation Commission <br /> February 21, I l <br /> Page 7. <br /> VOM: Susana Larmik made the motion that the comm3.ssion have 'a consultant in <br /> order to get more information on the issue of whether or not this is <br /> vernal pool and other issues. Frank Homeyer seconded. <br /> UNANIMUS VOTE. <br /> CAL 'Y: What are the specifics about what we are trying to reach. I was con- <br /> fused and did not think that the isolated land subject to flooding was the key <br /> issue and for some reason thought the vernal pool issue seemed to take the <br /> forefront. The consultant should look at least at three issues: <br /> 1. The vernal pool as a bota .st/biologist would look at it. <br /> . The isolated land subject to flooding calculations. <br /> . 3. The vernal pool calculations. <br /> • Agreed, there are some other aspects that might come to bear but <br /> 4 <br /> those are the chief ones. <br /> CA.ULEY: If in fact you get informs t ion from a consultant, confirming what we <br /> concluded, does this now give Mr. Pulsone the green light to go ahead or is <br /> there something else? To ham, it is a very big issue. <br /> SIMMONS: I realize that. I think because of the superseding order we would , <br /> at lust have to go back and check with town counsel as to whether he would <br /> have a green light. <br /> We should add, in cases i <br />