Laserfiche WebLink
Conservation Commission <br /> March 7, 1991 <br /> 'age 7. <br /> and disruption to the sediment. He asked if the Commission was asking h.im to <br /> check back with the Loves to see if they would be willing to have only one <br /> float and the plan redrawn with one float? <br /> Mr. Coffey stated the structure is excessively sized for that location. He <br /> asked for testimony from. the engineer of what is appropriate; it is not the <br /> place of the commission to design it. He would not go for the one that is <br /> there. <br /> Mr. Homeyer stated 131 does not address that issue, Chapter 91 does and also <br /> requires they have an Order of Conditions. <br /> Mr. Gray suggested ell m'nating the third float in the order of Conditions, <br /> it is not attached but roped onto the others. He showed a resort guide <br /> circa 1982 with the house and tee portion of the dock visible. He asked i <br /> it was the third float the commission was focused on, not the "T" <br /> Mr. Desrosiers would look negatively at anything that encourages boating with <br /> power and a prop in that area. <br /> The consensus of the Commission was that something else would be appropriate <br /> than ghat is presently there. <br /> Vim: Motion made and seconded to continue the hearing. <br /> CONTINUED To APRIL 18, 1991 - 7:00 p.m. <br /> BEACH : Michael Grot ke advised, concerning the earlier discussion, <br /> there is a supply side which has been cut off. The only source of sand is the <br /> eroding bank at Maushop which will be armored next year. If everything is <br /> armored, there will be no beach. <br /> He also advised the Commission the Moats on the marsh were brought into the <br /> New Seabury Marina by the Harbormaster. <br /> ASTABLE HOI INGCO, : Lot 31 Tritown Circle. Town Counsel recommended an <br /> enforcement order be issued as they are still in violation of the bylaw. <br /> Motion made and seconded to ratify an enforcement order to Barnstable <br /> Holding Co. <br /> BEDCWoD POM: <br /> GM: Motion made and seconded to ratify an enforcement order to Beechwood <br /> Point. <br /> NORIM s TIH: A Notice of Intent to be filed to address mitigation work which <br /> is beyond what would be permitted in an RDA. They cleared from the house to <br /> Deans Pond, 500-600 S.F. Since most of this will commie back, he would suggest <br /> minimal restoration, <br /> As a matter of policy, <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to require a Notice of Intent when the scope of <br /> work or damage is beyond whhat would be appropriate for an RDAS <br />