6/6/1991 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

Conservation Commission June om fission June 6.. 1991 Page 2. Public convent-was requested; there was none. VOTE: Motion rade and seconded to continue the hearing to July 25, 1991 at 7:00 p.m. EMI AT REW= OF A PLIANT. 7:15 IROBMT J. SLY, 3 Clover Dane, continued from May 16, 1991 for receipt of abutter notification receipts; these have been received. There were no comments from the Commission and no public cormnent. Motion made and seconded to close the hearing. HFAR CLOSED. 7:30 ROBERT WAGOSTIM, 20 scconsett Point .Road, continued from May 1 , 1991. Additional ional -soundings and information provided. Surveying by Eagle Engineering. Mine additional soundings showed 3.7 to 5.5 in the channel itself in the river. copy of the Notice and plan were sent to the restriction program. If changes are necessary in the plan, an amendment will be done. At the end of the existing pier, the depth of water is just under one foot. Sue Aran Richardson of Waterways is sticking to the interpretation that anything over 10% is substantial and an alteration of the license. I-lith the changes the Commission is talking about, the project falls from 99 years to 30 years. The new fees would kick in. Mr. Gray asked the design the Comnussion would alloy. -The float is 11' X 16.5 181 S.F. If the Commission determines a meed to go out the additional footage, would Board of Appeals action be necessary's The additional footage would increase water depth only by 8 - 10 inches. letter from the Shellfish Warden was read. Mr. Homeyer stated an amnesty permit could have been obtained without Commission approval and he did not want to make him change it. .I t was noted the two boats using the structure are a 241 10 with 12-16 inch draft and a 20' outboard with 14-16 inch draft. Mrs. Simmons suggested he berth his boats in a favorable manner With sterns out and advise the commission if upgrading crafts. Mr. Gray advised the original structure could be maintained with the amnesty license but any alterations would have to go through a separate filing and have -it's own license. Mr. Homeyer suggested guying tentative approval to the dock as built and to write a letter to Chapter 91 that people that come forward should not be penalized but worked with. Referring to 10.34 , shellfish can be relocated after conferring with the shellfish warden. Mr. Gray stated Chapter 91 allows a comment period with input encouraged from local boards. He suggested, if accepted as is at this level but down the road the extension was warranted, communication could be continued. The Notice of Intent includes maintenance. Ms Lannik agreed to write a letter to Chapter 91. Public comments were called for and none received.