08/09/1990 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

" R M CONSERVATION SSS ON Meeting of .August 9� 1990 y iYi�l Commissioners Present: Patrick Coffey, Gertrude Simmons, Renee King Fudala, Harry Desrosiers Frank Homeyer. Robert Sherman, Conservation Agent, and Susana Lannik, Associate Member, were present also. The meeting was called to order at 7:15 p.m. It was stated that Renee King Fudal.a i's married to Mashpee Town Planner, Thomas Fudala. 7:30 NEW S - SLY POND: Continued hearing for lack of requested information. A letter to be seat to advise information is to be supplied before the next sched- uled hearing date. CONTDUM To OCTOBER 1 , 1990 - 7:45 p.m. 7:45 MW SEAMY Co, for the rehabilitation of an existing dwelling, including site preparation and driveway improvements, at Lots 1365, 1366, 1367, 1368, 1369, 1370 with gazebo), 1.371, 1372, 1373, 1374, 1.375, 1376 (with dune walkover structure), 1.377, 1378 Shore Drive. Also, Lot .1379 Shore Drive for a proposed resource area improvement, The Commission was advised the incorrect hearing date had been used on the abutter notification and it will be necessary for all mutters to be rlenotified. CONTE TO AUC M 29 1990 - 6:30 p.m. AT THERBQ= of 7'HE APPLICANT. :00 1 CLTON GLASS: Continued from May 3, 1990, Thomas Norton presenting. Mr. Sherman reviewed" the case: an enforcement order was issued for beach nourishment without a permit. A sketch was provided showing where the eight tons of sand was placed in relation to the landmarks of the house. The Sabatia report stated the sand raised the level of the beadappro im t ly a little more than one inch. The Chairman read from the Sabatia report dated 20 June 1990. Mrs. Simmons asked if Mr. Class would be able in the future to nourish the beach from his-own property. Mr. Dorton advised it is the most difficult way, but it is possible. Mr. Sherman expressed concern with continual beach nourishment, not only with Mr. Glass, but anyone on that small pond. Mr. Coffey listed the range of options available to the Commission: to permit it as it is pre-existing; to condition it for further nourishment prohibit further nourishment; and, as an after-the-fact, could order it's removal. In the expert's report, it was pro-existing, has not changed substantially, eight toms was added without permission, but the sand in place has not caused a problem; getting the sand there was the issue* Nor. Sherman stated another issue, for the future, is the cumulative effect, not only on the Class property, but everywhere on the small pond.