08/23/1990 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

Conservation Commission Asst 23, 1990 Page 5. Mr. Sherman stated it should be recognized the Commission has new regulations on coastal banks in the bylaw to maxun e protection.. The Commission and New Seabury will have to look at them carefully in relation to the proposed alterations. An on-site to be held on Sunday, September 9th, at 9:30 a.m. CONMU D TO SEPMMER 20, 1990 - 7:45 to 8:45 P.m. 7:30 PAMICK & CAROL IEPMI , for a Determination of Applicability on a proposal to repair two wood piles, lifted by ice, on a dock at 27 Sandollar Lane. fan Buckley of New Seabury Co. presenting. Photos were shown of two large piles lifted one foot and shifted over. It is proposed to jet them down. The walkway was lifted off and temporary planks put on. Mr. Sherman noted the Commission would like to have therm removed from the marsh s soon as possible. Concerning the status of the dock, he advised the floats are different than on the plan; they have added a float. Mr. Buckley advised the walkway is lower than requirements but the grass underneath seems healthy. Paul Somerville did not feel there would be any problem. He suggested it be put in the Order that Shellfish be called when they put them back in and he will go down to inspect to see if any damage was done to clams and then assess a mitigation fee. He did not feel siltation screens were necessary. It was noted the float size should be 8 X 16; it is now two 8 X 16's. Mr. Homeyer stated, to condition it, it would have to be according to Chapter 91; they will have to remove one of them or be in violation of their Chapter 91 license, Mr. Sherman stated the extra Float has been in there for more than two years. Chapter 91 should be advised and let thein act upon it. Mr. Coffey pointed out the Commission is not being asked to address the float, permission is requested to replace two piles. Mr. Buckler stated he will advise the applicant that Chapter 91 is being notified. VM Motion rade and seconded to issue a negative determination but indicate there is to be no further enlargement. if any damage to shellfish or resources, possible mitigation to be requested. Mr, Buckley is to write to the Enrights with a copy to the Commission; they will have to respond' to the Chapter 91 violation. Mr. Homeyer abstained from the Grote. He stated he does not object to putting the pilings back in, but does not approve because of the Chapter 91 violation. MWIATIEVE DETERMINATION 7:45 VINCENT Po Com, ,R., 38 Wheelhouse Lane, Continued from March 22, 1 0. C NTINM TO DBCEMER131, 1990 - 7:30 p.m. *oo GMRGE RE T, 177 Iimberlane Drive, Continued from .duly 12, 1990. CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER201990 - 7:30 p.m.