08/23/1990 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

Conservation Commission August 2 , 1990 Page 7. of prior occurrences d The lot is not asking to be landscaped oar refilled; every- thing will be trucked off site and whatever can be reused will be. Within the work limit everything is coming down, all natural vegetation from the pond back to the street. All the trees in the work limit are going to be destroyed, Re- landscaping will be done in the areas where the trees will be gone. Mrs. Simons asked for the root systems to be taken out and was told on the entire site of the house the root system will be taken out. Mr. Homeyer advised at the previous hearing Janet Walsh had stated the lot had been cleared the year before. i . Mr. sanicki stated it was his opinion this lot was not totally cleared; some wood chips encroached from the lot next. door. Mr. Sherman advised some trees were cut beyond the 100 ft. lit for the spreading of the, wood chips, spread in violation, where he is under a Notice of Intent, Mr. Horeyer questioned whether the lot is the father's or the sonts. Mr. Sherman advised Town Counsel stated if attestation has been received from the Town Treasurer the Commission cannot get involved in those questions; abutters can challenge this, but it is not within the purview of the Commission. There was some clearing done but it was beyond the 100 foot jurisdiction. Mr. Coffey asked for a listing of the trees to be removed in order to determine impact and appropriate Mitigation. Removal from lot line to lot line may impact abutters next door. There is also a well which is a problem. How and what equip- ment will access this and what -will the impact be? Mr. Sanicki agreed to indicate the appropriate equipment but stated he will not be in control of the project. Mrs. S ons referred to the note on the landscape plan "Beech trees will remain wherever Possible". there should be an indication of what they might be. Ir. Sanicki will address this and the size and method of equipment to be used, Jim Walsh, an abutter, stated the cut for the foundation Looks to be 6 to 7 feet and assumption is fill is to be taken out; they have not seem a landscaping plan. . Coffey invited MUM to come forward to look at it. Janet Walsh stated she did not say that bank was stripped, the abutting lot was. She did say trees were taken out and a truckload of wood chips went into that lot and still sit, spread in violation. Richard shaughnessey, for Mshpee Land Conservation Trust, an abutter on the north side, stated they want to be sure there is no infringement on their lot, With the pond in a eutrophic condition, it is ridiculous to issue a septic permit. He urged the Commission to turn down this request. Mr. Sherman concurred, however under Title v laws there is not the ability to deny. Jim Walsh advised on the front to back cut of 10 feet, the stone walls will be 10 foot walls. The plan is ridiculous. As seen before, Mr. Regan will come bank three or four times and the gradient will have changed. CONTINUED TO 20.9 1990 - :15 p.m.