Laserfiche WebLink
-,Conservation Commission <br /> November 1, 1990 <br /> Page 3. <br /> Mr. Burgmann stated it would not be applicable to the Wise application if not DEP <br /> or Conmussion policy when the application was received. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated the policy is less restrictive than what is already on the books. <br /> Mr. Coffey stated he would like to see this as a policy guideline. <br /> Ms Lannik stated she would have a problem as it is a draft. <br /> Mr. Burgmann advised Falmouth, in their Wetlands Protection Bylaw, has adopted some- <br /> thing s i.lar to this. It helps him as a consultant to make a determination. Theme <br /> is potential for more accuracy with the men setting the top of the bank viswIly in <br /> the field, <br /> Ms Lannik stated she sloes not want to confuse anyone coming before the commission <br /> and is not comfortable with the adoption of this draft criteria. <br /> Mr. York agreed. <br /> To BE DISCUSSED AT A LATER HEARING DATE. <br /> 7:45 GEORGE M, WISE, 14 Ockway Bay Toad, to construct and maintain a swimng pool <br /> and appurtenances, pool deck, stairway and dr well. Bob Bur am presented abutters <br /> receipts. This project was before the commission previously in a different config- <br /> uration. The pool was centered behind the house overhanging the top of the coastal <br /> bank. It was denied because of the top of the coastal bank. It is the same plan <br /> except the pool and deck has been shifted laterally and reconfigured to keep behind <br /> the coastal bank to address the commission's concerns. <br /> With regard to the coastal bank itself, the regulations state the functions are: <br /> 1. To provide the material for beaches; 2. provide for flood protection. This is <br /> a well vegetated non-eroding coastal bare with no beach below so it is not providing <br /> that function. It is not a source of sand for the beaches. There is standing open <br /> water it is not an area of wave action. The two functions that the act speaks to <br /> are not functions that this bank, in this location and condition, serve in any great <br /> degree in any category. <br /> Iii . Homeyer asked if the 11 ft. mark i's the 100 year Flood and was told it i . <br /> Mr. Sherman stated that is not required. He advised, based on what he saw in the <br /> field and what is in the regulations, he sloes not agree that is the top of the bank. <br /> It would be a problematical project. ]ging the last filing lot was asked why an <br /> alternative Location at the other side of the house had not been considered, it <br /> could be relocated. <br /> Mr. Burgmann stated zoning restricts coming any closer to the property line than <br /> 15 feet. The privacy factor would be a question. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated the top of the bank is not what is shown by-the s takes according <br /> to the bylaw. He suggested the commissioners go out to take a look. He sees the <br /> break in slope at the 24 ft. contour coming through the pool, not the 22. Even if <br /> it does, assuming they were to grant that perception, does it alter more than loo S.F. <br /> If not, it could be permitted. <br /> Mr, York asked if a deck is proposed also and was told that it is. <br /> Mr. Burgmann advised the area they are altering is not more than 60 feet of the bank. <br /> Mr. Coffey asked if it can be done without destabilizing the Bank? Mr. Burgmann <br /> stated the outer side of the pool can be sheeted. It is a concrete Gunnite pool. <br />