My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/08/1990 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
03/08/1990 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2018 5:16:58 PM
Creation date
1/30/2018 8:13:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/08/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Conservation Commission <br /> March , 1990 <br /> Page 3. <br /> of the water. An Environmental study was done by Bill Richardson who was intro- <br /> duced to the Commission* He advised he categorized the vegetative comity on <br /> site wing vegetation that exists and that proposed. A reduction of the forest <br /> by 10% would not be good for the gray squirrel. However, as the trees age the <br /> suitability will come back for indigenous wild life. vista pruning should not <br /> occur on this site as it would cause a decline' in the Black-capped chickadee <br /> and Downy Woodpecker species. <br /> Mr. Coffey asked if there is a loss from clearing already taken out. <br /> Mr. Richardson stated placing the stairway over the existing stairway there i <br /> no loss of vegetation. <br /> Mrs. Simmons asked if the coverage from the deck will effect the spawning areas <br /> in the water itself. <br /> Mr. Richardson did not see shadowing as a problem; in this instance providing <br /> nesting habitat for small mouth bass. He also felt the "T" arrangement was <br /> far ahead of any others. <br /> Concerning the depth of the water, the Commission was told it i --1/2 ft. <br /> The revised plan shows the dock to be seasonal. <br /> Mr. Sherman advised people he has talked with at State Fish & Wildlife and <br /> Federal Fish & Wildlifefeel this type of analysis is designed for larger <br /> tracts and not relevent for small parcels. In choosing the indicative species, <br /> it should certify the species that exist on the property. There are some num- <br /> erical errors. He stated the Commission should have more time to look it over. <br /> This report, at this time, does not provide the type of information that should <br /> be in a wildlife habitat evaluation as put fort. by DEP Program Policies. <br /> Mr. Hall advised he will be at the site tomorrow with a person from DEP. <br /> There were no comments from the 'public. <br /> CCITICM To APRIL 19, 1990 - :15 P.M. <br /> HIS WOOD ITER . , <br /> Daniel's Island Road - Water Ma�.n. <br /> CONTINUED TO APRIL 5. 1990 - 9:00 P.M. AT THE REQUEST of THE APPLICANT. <br /> 8:15 KENNETH PAR LSKI, 351 M nom oscoy Road, Continued from January 25. <br /> Mr. & Mrs. Parolski presenting. <br /> Mr. Sherman advised, although Mr. Parolsi was told he could file an RDA, <br /> information received of late from DEP requires this to be filed as a Notice <br /> of Intent. He suggested for a Notice of Intent the Commission waive the <br /> Town fees under the Town bylaw and ware the town portion of the state fees. <br /> The information provided could be incorporated into a Notice of Intent. The <br /> project can be conditioned the night of the hearing. There would not be <br /> problem with the rebuilding of the dock; the dredging could not be done. <br /> Mr. Parol.ski agreed with Mr. Shermani s suggestions. The Request for Deter- <br /> mination of Applicability to be Withdrawn Without Prejudice, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.