Laserfiche WebLink
Conservation Commission <br /> April 5, 1990 <br /> Page 2. <br /> Mr, Sherman stated he could look at the vegetation and topography and come to <br /> a consensus which low spots should be left. <br /> CONTINUED To APRIL 2 - 7:00 P.M. To ALLOW AN ON-SITE WITH THE AGENT AND <br /> REPRESENTATIVES of FELLS POND GROUP. To be held April 8. Sunday, 2:00 P. I. <br /> 7:45 JEANN E G. SYL ESTER, for a proposed 12' X 261 wooden deck,,, installation <br /> of wells and water services, construction of a new sewage disposal system at <br /> Great River Road, Lots 428, 429, 430. <br /> Advertisement notice was sent from Town Hall lacking postage and were returned <br /> too late for abutters to be notified by the agent. <br /> Nor. Sylvester was present and had not been notified by the engineer. <br /> CONTINUED To APRIL 19 - 8:01 P.M. <br /> oo ROBERT BDDNATO, continued from February 8. George Thorng advised this, <br /> measures 21 foot longer than proposed but is only 18 feet further out into <br /> the water. New soundings were not done as the dock is designed to handle <br /> whatever size boat they have that required that amount of draft closer to <br /> shore and to remove 10 feet or more of the structure would be more environ- <br /> mentally <br /> nor1ron- <br /> mentally damaging. It made more sense to him to go through the chapter 91 <br /> process for the additional footage. <br /> Paul Somervil le's comments were read. He did not find significant break in <br /> slope and shortening the pier is of no betterment. <br /> Mr. Sherman agreed and stated as long as the plan reflects the actual size <br /> of the pier, he had no problem with it. <br /> A letter is to be written to Crosby who will be sharing the expense with <br /> Arrow Engineering as both parties are at fault. Mr, Thorng was advised <br /> they should return to the Board of Appeals for a minor modification. <br /> A cosy of the 1985 proposed plan was left with the Commission. <br /> HEARING CLOSED -- ORDER of CONDITIONS IN 21 DAYS. <br /> 8: 15 CHARLES TALANIAN., for a Determination ination of Applicability on a proposal to <br /> hard seed a parking ng area, place a split-rail fence on the boundary of an ease- <br /> ment,, landscape a hydrant area and replacement of haybales with bark mulch at <br /> 9 ocl way Bay Road. Mary LeBlanc presenting. A letter from Mr. Tal ars i an with- <br /> drawing some of the proposed items was read. <br /> Ids LeBlanc advised they will be planting a specimen tree and doing berry i rig. <br /> It is requested to remove the section of haybales visible from the deck. <br /> The issue of the dock, in which she was not involved, has been resolved <br /> and regarding the issue of the erosion on the slope, the loge grass cannot <br /> e seeded until June. <br /> Mrs. Simmons asked if they would be doing any more planting and was told no. <br /> She suggested the haybales not be removed but gently scattered; the siltation <br /> screen can be removed to the front end of the house but the haybales left. <br /> Ms LeBlanc suggested more bark Much could be added* <br /> Mrs. Simmons stated, from the end of the house, the haybales have washed over <br /> and the siltation screen is in rough condition. They should be re-established. <br /> Ms LeBlanc agreed. <br />