Laserfiche WebLink
t . <br /> April 1 , 1990 <br /> Page 9. <br /> Ms, Behrman asked how different is this plan from what was <br /> approved by the Board of Appeals * <br /> . Bu rgmann stated there has been a lateral translation; the <br /> original plan called for it to be an extension of the stairs <br /> and we just moved it. The reason for the lateral translation <br /> is p â–ºrtly what Mr. Boyd described and also to comply with the <br /> Corps of Engineers requirement for non-interference with <br /> abutting properties, not wanting to see the dock come within <br /> 25 feet. <br /> Ms Behrman stated this is a complete change in location by 2 <br /> teet, not just a minor chance in shape . would they be <br /> proposing to abandon the existing stairs in that case <br /> Mr. Burgmann stated no, because the stairs are access to the <br /> beach. This is how they get down to the beach now. They are <br /> proposing to bring them across and out to the platform above <br /> the, beach with this and this location ( pointing to the plan ) . <br /> If they were to abandon the stairs that were there , they <br /> would have no access . <br /> Ms Behrman stated there will be the continuing impacts on the <br /> beach plus the impacts of the clod. There is a motion on the <br /> table . <br /> Mr. Sherman asked to speak to the motion even though unable <br /> to vote . In his opinion the gradual nibbling away of the <br /> shellfish habitats is being seen -which is what the commission <br /> is supposed to be protecting . He thought the commission <br /> should -listen to the shellfish warden ' s testimony and be <br /> cognizant of the role in protecting that interest of the act. <br /> Ms Behrman called for any discussion. <br /> Mr. Halpern stated he would like to see this seat back to the <br /> Board of Appeals to be made longer. <br /> Ms Behrman pointed out there was one motion on the table . <br /> Clark Hill asked to speak as a direct abutter. He and his <br /> family have had - a house there for 40 years . This pier thing <br /> has been going on for a couple of years. He came vrith no <br /> lawyers , consultants, environmentalists, or surveyors . He <br /> attended the Board of Appeals meeting last year for which <br /> there is a law suit. It was suggested to him if he was going <br /> to make an appeal that he should hire an environmental <br /> consultant to present his viewpoints . if he hired an <br /> environmental consultant, he would not be paying him unless <br /> he was going to present a case that was oriented toward his <br /> feelings and he does not want any peir there at all . <br /> Obviously anyone hired by the Bradshaws is going to give an <br /> pinion based on the viewpoint of the Bradshaws . He feels <br /> that there are two agencies in the town , one with a full-time <br />