12/27/1990 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

cn s erva t i on Commission December 27, 1990 Page 9. Mr. Coffey asked the height of the walls and was told 6 feet at the highest point, i Mr. Buckley advised the lot next door has a new house, not fully landscaped and all vegetation removed. Some of the fill along the retaining walls was removed to expose more of the wall which is not pressure treated timbers. . Zeppenfeld stated there was 4 feet originally; the job next door has removed some material from this- man's wall.. It was noted this is not zero lot line, under the special permit. The owner i willing to go forward. The chairman read a letter into the record from the abutting property owners, Ron & Shirley Bernaducci, who are in opposition to the project. !r. Zeppenfeld stated they can improve the problem that exists and improve the retaining walls in the process ■ Mr. Coffey questioned the amount of lot coma . Mr. Buckley advised it is under the requirement. The lot next door, Mr. Bernaducci' , has exceeded their coverage. Mr. Coffey stated the commission cannot close. This must go before zoning board of appeals. He asked if they have filed' They had not. Mr. Zeppenfeld listed the items the commission would like to see: mitigation of runoff; stabilization and engineering for retaining walls, if impacted by garage. Mr. Desrosiers requested construction details for any runoff. A continuance for two months was requested. O1ID TO BCH 71 1991 — 7:30 .1 . 9:00 GARY VITAIE, for a eterrl.ination of Applicability on the proposed installation f a 'private drinking well at 67 Edgewater load, Notice of Intent filed under the Mashpee Town Bylaw only for the construction of a single family dwelling, reta�ng wall; crushed stone driveway; 8 x 50 ft. wood deck and water service line. Joseph Harvey presented abutter receipts. Under the state, the dwelling is more than 100 feet from the pond, but less under the town bylaw to the inland bark. On the RDA for the proposed well, they are within 100 feet of Santinit Pond; the well drillers have opted for a'hnd auger. They have no desire to cut a path clown to that location. There is a straight shot to the house that would allow a bobcat without removing a tree for the service line. A Haybale dike to be placed to prevent erosion. Mr. Coffey asked if it would be a two man gas auger, hand operated and was told it was. with extensions they will be able to draw Rater. They have approval from the Board of Health subject to Commission approval, It will not be necessary to cut down any trees. 'there are a half-dozen Beech trees on site. They are deflecting the pipe to avoid a large oak. W. Coffey read from the cornents from the agent: He was unsure where the retaining wall was located on the plan; there should be no lawn pond side and should be comp- ensatory plantings, shrubs and/or trees. Access to the water on the steep bank will cause erosion. Mr. Harvey advised the client has mentioned a possible dock and was told that would be taken up in the future. The retaining wall that falls within the buffer zone is on the right side which is the solid line; grade 69.0 dorm to 64 and comes under the Notice of intent.