Laserfiche WebLink
improperly to demand that it be taken out and the area restored. <br /> We cannot do that as far as this particular application goes, <br /> Does it have to be turned down and wait for thea to make Notice of <br /> Intent? There are 20 some odd lots with a pier extending' 48 ,. 581 <br /> out into that pond if lot faces shoreline. Mr. Buckingham wondered <br /> • if there is some way we could do away with this idea of 'individual <br /> piers and have a central pier in- common. It was noted that should <br /> have been .included in the planning stage. You could contact the <br /> association because there are reserved parcels4, Most -of the entire <br /> thing is covered by a conservation easement in varying widths around <br /> it* Varying from 40 - 501 1001 , In this particular case there is <br /> 201 easement on lot 29. The stairs are on the easement. <br /> We cannot use that' as a basis to refuse the permission to wild <br /> the pier. Aren't.we giving up our rights in letting it go through? <br /> g <br /> We can write to them and toll them to remove stairs or file a Notice <br /> of Intent. <br /> Mr. Bu ki ghwa would like to see thea limited as far as length <br /> goes. He, talked to Chester Koblinsky that morning and asked him 3. <br /> he would 'mind terribly telling him what he thought. said he Would <br /> like to see docks in that area no longer than ' maximum* He claims <br /> that you're not going to get much more water with 141. You shouldn't <br /> go beyond 50' . <br /> 5 <br /> if we give 641 docks, it will be a mess. Couldn't the docks be <br /> shortened `and moorings used. Plenty of room for moorings and the ' . <br /> sticking way out. Buck <br /> make more sense than all these thingsy <br /> . <br /> in ham said that ghat h is nvisi ning i instead of steps have <br /> a cantilevered bridge to start before embankment before the easement <br /> i <br /> starts. - arc '- <br /> ire over easement area and coming into the dock. That <br /> would be about 201 from the high land down to the water and another <br /> 8, you could gain which would still put him in the 31 area and <br /> ten <br /> hang a mooring. This Ls what he would like to see. ' I see 20 lots <br /> here - lot extensions going out into that pond. <br /> Hr. Eldridge said these Deople are paying a lot of money and want <br /> convenience in their awn area - they consider it their rig t. <br /> It was mentioned that there are too many jetties and breakwaters <br /> going out. Fake it Individually. If soraeone else has it someone <br /> else will want it. Do not want to prohibit docks in that area - just <br /> would like one big dock. Mrs. Studley said that that would constitute <br /> marina and that's impossible. Mr. Buckingham said that to protect <br /> everybody he would like to see a shorter dock with n orin s. They <br /> could tie a little dory up to the docks - only need a foot and a half 4 <br /> of water. He thins we should limit the docks in that area to 50 and <br /> also limit the number of docks. (The dock is only 481 but with float <br /> extends to 641.1) <br /> Studley said we'll have to take this under advisement and dis- <br /> cuss it further. She didn't know if the Conservation officer had been <br /> down to look at it or note but we, should get his opinion. <br /> I`- r. Buckingham wanted to know what substitute they would have for <br /> creosote piles, that we are trying to get away from using them. Mr. <br /> Eldridge said there is a method of treating them under pressure so there <br /> is no fear of future leaching. It is riot .like railroad ties - Fenta <br /> Synthetic, It locks itself and seals it in. He doesn't know of any <br /> other ryeth d. <br /> ilIr. Buckinghalq said he wouldn't want to see steel in there on Cape <br /> Cod. Would rather see galvanized steel than the creosote. Eldridge <br /> said., as he understands, <br />