Laserfiche WebLink
' i y <br />_ 1 <br /> 4 <br /> file with the I ashpee Conservation Commission.1t <br /> Mr. Home er, Mr. McGuire, Mr. Roberts and fir. Bonitto looked at the plans. <br /> Mr. Bohr appeared and stated that he is a registered, professional. engineer <br /> from Falmouth and has done sanitary engineering and environmental work for 3 <br /> years, He mentioned that there is a file number � SE4343, He said that there <br /> s a neer DQE engineer by the name of Brian Donahue who was confused and who <br /> wrote him a letter about the ground table. He explained that they are 41 move <br /> the ground table or DEQE wouldn't have issued the file number. <br /> He further said that the other question is regarding the area of the lot <br /> and he proud like to clarify that issue by stating that they have gone to con' <br /> siderable expense � they don tt trust the Assessors plans,, so they hired a fim <br /> of re'gistereds professional surveyors. He said they have stamped and certified <br /> the area and if the Commission wishes, he can give them that plan 4= he main� <br /> tains that the Assessors area is not correct. <br /> In answer to Mrs. De oryIs question,, Mr. Spohr said that the abutters have <br /> been notified. , The owner of record is James E. Farnsworth ,- he shored a copy <br /> of the sales agreement for Mr. and Mrs. Morse. Mr. Spohr said that this house <br /> is in the flood plain and it is floodproof a- the lot has a total area of <br /> . , 00 square feeto with a 5.501 elevation. He said that inasmuch as there is <br /> no town water., they are required to provide a well and he fianted to part out <br /> that the well is more than 1001 radius from the nearest 1each3Lng. The type of <br /> sewerage that they proposed is common and approved by DEQ w a flow diffuser <br /> which conforms with Title 5- <br /> There <br /> was confusion about the running of the tests because of the charts, <br /> Mr. Buckingham said that DEQE looked at flood tilde charts and they looked at <br /> the wrong area because of the tide. Mr. Buckingham went back to the area when <br /> he realized that DEE had looked at the wrong chart and ascertained that they <br /> were between 15 and 20 mutes of the high tidew <br /> To the lam, this may sound confusing, but it gets clearer. Mr. Donahue <br /> rade a statement in his letter to Mr. Spohr that he would not accept this and <br /> issue a file number inasmuch as the plans do not meet Title 5 requirements. Nore <br /> spphr said that DEQE made a mistake. He stated haat he saw this even though it <br /> did state that tide was at us one. The ground elevation should have been <br /> taken and recorded at high. tide* <br /> He pointed out that the base level in the flood ply is at 321 an this <br /> mons that the f i - t habitable floor must be 111 or higher � there rust be no <br /> basement and all the mechanical and electrical mast be above that base level. <br /> He pointed out that the douse is approximately 30 X 32 and has an attached two <br /> oar garage. He also ported out that the- finished first floor is at 111 go it <br /> shows the top of the foundation at 101 and then they come down to 61, which will <br /> be exposed. The effluent line comes out at 5 and it goes into the septic tank <br /> t 4,m84., All should be approved by the Board of Health. <br /> r. McGuire asked if the beach mark was at 51. Mr. Spohr said that he said <br /> that all of these elevation are mean sea level elevations, so when a contractor <br /> goes in there, he doesn't go in and measure the tide - Spohr designates the beach <br /> mark at *5 . Mr. McGuire asked if the bench nark is on Whippoorwill Circle and <br /> Mr. Spohr said it was - the concrete bound is very visible s They selected that <br /> aw 3 — <br />